SHOAIB HASIM VAJIHUDDIN vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA — IA/1765/2026

Case under Criminal Procedure Code (Cr.pc) Section 439. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 11th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM010261142026

Filing Number

IA/10933/2026

Filing Date

04-Jun-2026

Registration No

IA/1765/2026

Registration Date

04-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Shyam C. Chandak

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Shyam C. Chandak

Bench Type

Single

Category

CRIMINAL ( 9 )

Sub-Category

482 Cr.P. C. / 528 BNSS Application other than Quashing and 156 (3) Cr.P.C./ 175(3) BNSS ( 115 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal

Decision Date

11-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 12-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Criminal Procedure Code (Cr.pc) Section 439
Indian Penal Code (I.p.c) Section 304(2),337,338

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SHOAIB HASIM VAJIHUDDIN

    Adv. PARINAM LAW ASSOCIATES

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Shyam C. ChandakView PDF

    The Bombay High Court allowed Shoaib Hasim Vajihuddin's interim application to retrieve his passport for travel to London from June 13 to July 9, 2026, to attend a religious program. The court noted that his bail order contained no condition requiring prior permission for foreign travel, and he had previously returned his passport after four earlier trips abroad. The court imposed conditions requiring him to furnish detailed travel itinerary and contact information to the investigating officer and file an undertaking to redeposit the passport upon return. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Jun-2026

    For Circulation

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Shyam C. Chandak

  4. 04-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. IA/1765/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court allowed Shoaib Hasim Vajihuddin's interim application to retrieve his passport for travel to London from June 13 to July 9, 2026, to attend a religious program. The court noted that his bail order contained no condition requiring prior permission for foreign travel, and he had previously returned his passport after four earlier trips abroad. The court imposed conditions requiring him to furnish detailed travel itinerary and contact information to the investigating officer and file an undertaking to redeposit the passport upon return. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case