MAGANBHAI VESTABHAI BARAF AND ORS vs UNION TERRITORY OF D. AND N.H. AND D.D. ( THR. THE ADMINI. ) OF D. AND N.H. AND D.D. AND ORS — WP/7116/2026
Case under C.p.c.- (Interlocutory Order) Section NA. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 05th June 2026.
CNR: HCBM010260902026
Filing Number
WP/15168/2026
Filing Date
04-Jun-2026
Registration No
WP/7116/2026
Registration Date
04-Jun-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Farhan Parvez Dubash
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Farhan Parvez Dubash
Bench Type
Single
Category
ORDINARY CIVIL ( 30 )
Sub-Category
ORDINARY CIVIL ( 11 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
05-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Last updated 06-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MAGANBHAI VESTABHAI BARAF AND ORS
Adv. Adv Sanket Dorugade
-
2.BHIKUBHAI VESTABHAI BARAF
-
3.LAKHAMIBEN VANASHABHAI BARAF W/O VANASHABHAI VESTABHAI BARAF
-
4.CHHANIYABHAI KIKALABHAI VALVI
-
5.JAYESHBHAI CHHAGANBHAI PATEL
-
6.KISHOREBHAI BHIKUBHAI BARAF
Respondent(s)
-
1.UNION TERRITORY OF D. AND N.H. AND D.D. ( THR. THE ADMINI. ) OF D. AND N.H. AND D.D. AND ORS
-
2.THE DIST.COLLECTOR, SILVASSA
-
3.RESIDENT DEPUTY COLLECTOR (S)
-
4.KAMLESHBHAI GOMANBHAI PATEL
-
5.NANUBHAI VESTABHAI BARAF
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
05-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Farhan Parvez DubashView PDF
Case Summary: The Bombay High Court allowed the writ petition and directed that the status quo order granted on 23rd April 2026 shall continue until the pronouncement of the order on the petitioners' main application (Exhibit '5') scheduled for 15th June 2026. The court found it unjust that the lower court had adjourned the matter without continuing the status quo, thereby leaving the petitioners' interests unprotected pending final orders. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
05-Jun-2026
For Circulation
Hon'ble Shri Justice Farhan Parvez Dubash
-
04-Jun-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP/7116/2026
Case Summary: The Bombay High Court allowed the writ petition and directed that the status quo order granted on 23rd April 2026 shall continue until the pronouncement of the order on the petitioners' main application (Exhibit '5') scheduled for 15th June 2026. The court found it unjust that the lower court had adjourned the matter without continuing the status quo, thereby leaving the petitioners' interests unprotected pending final orders. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts