MAGANBHAI VESTABHAI BARAF AND ORS vs UNION TERRITORY OF D. AND N.H. AND D.D. ( THR. THE ADMINI. ) OF D. AND N.H. AND D.D. AND ORS — WP/7116/2026
Case under C.p.c.- (Interlocutory Order) Section NA. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 05th June 2026.
CNR: HCBM010260902026
Filing Number
WP/15168/2026
Filing Date
04-06-2026
Registration No
WP/7116/2026
Registration Date
04-06-2026
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE FARHAN PARVEZ DUBASH
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE FARHAN PARVEZ DUBASH
Bench Type
Single
Category
ORDINARY CIVIL ( 30 )
Sub-Category
ORDINARY CIVIL ( 11 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
05th June 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
MAGANBHAI VESTABHAI BARAF AND ORS
Adv. Adv Sanket Dorugade
BHIKUBHAI VESTABHAI BARAF
LAKHAMIBEN VANASHABHAI BARAF W/O VANASHABHAI VESTABHAI BARAF
CHHANIYABHAI KIKALABHAI VALVI
JAYESHBHAI CHHAGANBHAI PATEL
KISHOREBHAI BHIKUBHAI BARAF
Respondent(s)
UNION TERRITORY OF D. AND N.H. AND D.D. ( THR. THE ADMINI. ) OF D. AND N.H. AND D.D. AND ORS
THE DIST.COLLECTOR, SILVASSA
RESIDENT DEPUTY COLLECTOR (S)
KAMLESHBHAI GOMANBHAI PATEL
NANUBHAI VESTABHAI BARAF
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE FARHAN PARVEZ DUBASH
FOR CIRCULATION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 05-06-2026 | FOR CIRCULATION |
Orders
Case Summary: The Bombay High Court allowed the writ petition and directed that the status quo order granted on 23rd April 2026 shall continue until the pronouncement of the order on the petitioners' main application (Exhibit '5') scheduled for 15th June 2026. The court found it unjust that the lower court had adjourned the matter without continuing the status quo, thereby leaving the petitioners' interests unprotected pending final orders. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: The Bombay High Court allowed the writ petition and directed that the status quo order granted on 23rd April 2026 shall continue until the pronouncement of the order on the petitioners' main application (Exhibit '5') scheduled for 15th June 2026. The court found it unjust that the lower court had adjourned the matter without continuing the status quo, thereby leaving the petitioners' interests unprotected pending final orders. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts