RAMAN SHAMRAO RATH AND ORS vs RATH MANSION CO OP. HSG. SOC. LTD AND ORS — WP/7119/2026

Case under C.p.c.- (Interlocutory Order) Section NA. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 11th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM010260562026

Filing Number

WP/15165/2026

Filing Date

03-Jun-2026

Registration No

WP/7119/2026

Registration Date

04-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice N. J. Jamadar

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice N. J. Jamadar

Bench Type

Single

Category

ORDINARY CIVIL ( 30 )

Sub-Category

ORDINARY CIVIL ( 11 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

11-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 12-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

C.p.c.- (Interlocutory Order) Section NA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAMAN SHAMRAO RATH AND ORS

    Adv. Samir

  2. 2.BASIL SHAMRAO RATH

  3. 3.JOYCE SHAMRAO RATH

  4. 4.HERMANN SHAMRAO RATH

  5. 5.USHA CECIL RATH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RATH MANSION CO OP. HSG. SOC. LTD AND ORS

  2. 2.THE ADMINISTRATOR OF RATH MANSION CHS LTD., THRO THE DEPUTY REGISTRAR

  3. 3.VIDHYA PATIL

  4. 4.RAMANI MENON

  5. 5.SHARAD GOVIND JOG

  6. 6.K K DAMA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice N. J. JamadarView PDF

    The Bombay High Court dismissed the Petitioners' writ petition challenging the City Civil Court's rejection of their application to amend the plaint. The court found that the proposed amendments—adding claims regarding fraudulent voter lists, illegal deemed conveyance applications, and unauthorized parking lot conversions—would fundamentally alter the nature of the suit from damages for malicious prosecution to declarations regarding the Society's rights, constituting materially distinct causes of action. However, the court granted the Petitioners two weeks to adduce evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Jun-2026

    Fresh Admission

    Hon'ble Shri Justice N. J. Jamadar

  4. 03-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/7119/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court dismissed the Petitioners' writ petition challenging the City Civil Court's rejection of their application to amend the plaint. The court found that the proposed amendments—adding claims regarding fraudulent voter lists, illegal deemed conveyance applications, and unauthorized parking lot conversions—would fundamentally alter the nature of the suit from damages for malicious prosecution to declarations regarding the Society's rights, constituting materially distinct causes of action. However, the court granted the Petitioners two weeks to adduce evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case