M/S PATRON FACILITY MANAGEMENT PVT. LTD. vs EDELWEISS RETAIL FINANCE LIMITED — HCBM10260502026
Case under Securitisation & Reconstruction of Finiancial Assets Act. Next hearing: 03rd June 2026.
CNR: HCBM010260502026
Filing Number
WP/15160/2026
Filing Date
03-Jun-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Shyam C. Chandak , Hon'ble Shri Justice Farhan Parvez Dubash
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Shyam C. Chandak , Hon'ble Shri Justice Farhan Parvez Dubash
Bench Type
Division
Category
MERCANTILE LAWS COMMERCIAL TRANSACTIONS , BANKS ( 28 )
Sub-Category
MATTERS RELATING TO SECURITISATION AND RECONSTRUCTION OF FINANCIAL ASSETS ( 10 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Last updated 04-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.M/S PATRON FACILITY MANAGEMENT PVT. LTD.
Adv. KRUTI BHAVSAR
-
2.SAPNA DHARMENDRA SINGH
-
3.DHARMENDRA SAMARTH SINGH
Respondent(s)
-
1.EDELWEISS RETAIL FINANCE LIMITED
Case History
-
03-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
03-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Shyam C. Chandak,hon'ble Shri Justice Farhan Parvez DubashView PDF
Case Summary The High Court of Bombay disposed of the writ petition after the respondent (Edelweiss Retail Finance Limited) agreed to postpone possession action on the disputed property at Star Premier, Bhayander until the Debt Recovery Tribunal-III decides Interim Application No.1978 of 2026. The court directed no coercive action be taken during this period and requested expedited hearing of the application, while leaving all parties' contentions open for consideration in appropriate proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
03-Jun-2026
For Circulation
Hon'ble Shri Justice Shyam C. Chandak , Hon'ble Shri Justice Farhan Parvez Dubash
-
03-Jun-2026
Case filed
Case Summary The High Court of Bombay disposed of the writ petition after the respondent (Edelweiss Retail Finance Limited) agreed to postpone possession action on the disputed property at Star Premier, Bhayander until the Debt Recovery Tribunal-III decides Interim Application No.1978 of 2026. The court directed no coercive action be taken during this period and requested expedited hearing of the application, while leaving all parties' contentions open for consideration in appropriate proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts