AZIM SHAKOOR PATEL vs CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PUNE AND ANR Advocate - MULLA AND MULLA AND CBC — WP/7323/2026

Case under C.p.c.- (Interlocutory Order) Section NA. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 15th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM010260462026

Filing Number

WP/15158/2026

Filing Date

03-Jun-2026

Registration No

WP/7323/2026

Registration Date

11-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice N. J. Jamadar

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice N. J. Jamadar

Bench Type

Single

Category

ORDINARY CIVIL ( 30 )

Sub-Category

ORDINARY CIVIL ( 11 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

15-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 17-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

C.p.c.- (Interlocutory Order) Section NA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.AZIM SHAKOOR PATEL

    Adv. Kaustubh Nale

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PUNE AND ANR Advocate - MULLA AND MULLA AND CBC

  2. 2.PUNE CANTONMENT BOARD THR. ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice N. J. JamadarView PDF

    The High Court of Bombay dismissed Azim Shakoor Patel's writ petition challenging a Section 239 notice issued by the Pune Cantonment Board, holding that since the petitioner had already invoked the appellate remedy before the Principal Director under the Cantonments Act 2006, the lower courts were justified in declining interim relief. The court directed the Appellate Authority to decide the pending appeal expeditiously and consider granting ad-interim stay if unable to decide promptly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 15-Jun-2026

    Fresh Admission

    Hon'ble Shri Justice N. J. Jamadar

  4. 03-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/7323/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Bombay dismissed Azim Shakoor Patel's writ petition challenging a Section 239 notice issued by the Pune Cantonment Board, holding that since the petitioner had already invoked the appellate remedy before the Principal Director under the Cantonments Act 2006, the lower courts were justified in declining interim relief. The court directed the Appellate Authority to decide the pending appeal expeditiously and consider granting ad-interim stay if unable to decide promptly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case