MRS. JAYSHREE NARAYAN SHINDE vs M/S NARAYAN BUILDERS AND DEVELOPERS — HCBM10259662026
Case under Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 Section 11. Next hearing: 03rd July 2026.
CNR: HCBM010259662026
e-Filing Number
21-05-2026
Filing Number
ARP/15116/2026
Filing Date
02-Jun-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Jitendra Shantilal Jain
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Jitendra Shantilal Jain
Bench Type
Single
Category
ARBITRATION ( 4 )
Sub-Category
APPOINTMENT OF ARBITRATORS ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Last updated 20-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MRS. JAYSHREE NARAYAN SHINDE
Adv. ANSHUMAN DESHMUKH
-
2.Mahendra Devidas Shinde
Adv. ANSHUMAN BHAIYYASAHEB DESHMUKH
-
3.Rajendra Devidas Shinde
Adv. ANSHUMAN BHAIYYASAHEB DESHMUKH
Respondent(s)
-
1.M/S NARAYAN BUILDERS AND DEVELOPERS
-
2.Anil Jagannath Shinde
-
3.Sunil Jagannath Shinde
-
4.Hemlata Jagannath Shinde
-
5.Prabhakar Narayan Shinde
-
6.Bhagwan Narayan Shinde Through his Legal Heirs
-
7.Jagannath Narayan Shinde
-
8.Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited BSNL Through General ManagerAuthorised Representative
-
9.Cholamandalam Investments and finance company Through General ManagerAuthorised Representative
Case History
-
03-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
03-Jul-2026
Fresh Matters Auto Listed
Hon'ble Shri Justice Jitendra Shantilal Jain
-
19-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Jitendra Shantilal JainView PDF
Case Summary: In Arbitration Petition (ST) No.15116 of 2026 before the Bombay High Court, notice was issued to respondents M/s Narayan Builders & Developers and others, returnable on 3 July 2026. The court permitted private service by all permissible modes with an affidavit of service to be filed. The petition is at an interim stage awaiting respondents' reply. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
02-Jun-2026
Case filed
Case Summary: In Arbitration Petition (ST) No.15116 of 2026 before the Bombay High Court, notice was issued to respondents M/s Narayan Builders & Developers and others, returnable on 3 July 2026. The court permitted private service by all permissible modes with an affidavit of service to be filed. The petition is at an interim stage awaiting respondents' reply. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts