RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THRU PP AND ORS — IA/3809/2026

Case under Securitisation & Reconstruction of Finiancial Assets Act Section 226. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 09th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM010259022026

Filing Number

IA/15091/2026

Filing Date

01-Jun-2026

Registration No

IA/3809/2026

Registration Date

03-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble The Acting Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Gautam A. Ankhad

Coram

Hon'ble The Acting Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Gautam A. Ankhad

Bench Type

Division

Category

ORDINARY CIVIL ( 30 )

Sub-Category

OTHERS ( 99 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

09-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Securitisation & Reconstruction of Finiancial Assets Act Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA

    Adv. Maniksha Sharma

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THRU PP (Public Prosecutor) AND ORS

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Jun-2026

    For Circulation

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale , Hon'ble Shri Justice Shreeram Vinayak Shirsat

  3. 09-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra V. Ghuge,hon'ble Shri Justice Gautam A. AnkhadView PDF

    The Bombay High Court disposed of Interim Application No. 3809/2026 (filed in Writ Petition No. 4789/2026) by withdrawing both the petition and interim application on the petitioner's instructions, as they had become infructuous. The court noted that the petitioner intends to initiate a fresh Special Civil Suit, with all stakeholders' contentions to remain open in any subsequent civil proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 01-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. IA/3809/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court disposed of Interim Application No. 3809/2026 (filed in Writ Petition No. 4789/2026) by withdrawing both the petition and interim application on the petitioner's instructions, as they had become infructuous. The court noted that the petitioner intends to initiate a fresh Special Civil Suit, with all stakeholders' contentions to remain open in any subsequent civil proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case