ALIYA FIRDOUS ABDUL MOMIN vs THE GOVERNMENT OF MAHARASHTRA THRU ENERGY DEPT. AND ORS — WP/6945/2026
Case under Electricity Act 2003 Section N. Next hearing: 29th June 2026.
CNR: HCBM010258432026
Filing Number
WP/15076/2026
Filing Date
29-May-2026
Registration No
WP/6945/2026
Registration Date
29-May-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Shyam C. Chandak , Hon'ble Shri Justice Farhan Parvez Dubash
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Shyam C. Chandak , Hon'ble Shri Justice Farhan Parvez Dubash
Bench Type
Division
Category
ELECTRICITY ( 13 )
Sub-Category
RECONNECTION ( 9 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Last updated 03-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.ALIYA FIRDOUS ABDUL MOMIN
Adv. Kunal D Nawale
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE GOVERNMENT OF MAHARASHTRA THRU ENERGY DEPT. AND ORS
-
2.THE MAHARASHTRA STATE ELECTRICITY DISTRIBUTION CO. LTD.
-
3.TORRENT POWER LTD.
Case History
-
29-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
29-Jun-2026
For Circulation
Hon'ble Shri Justice Shyam C. Chandak , Hon'ble Shri Justice Farhan Parvez Dubash
-
01-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Shyam C. Chandak,hon'ble Shri Justice Farhan Parvez DubashView PDF
Case Summary: WP/6945/2026 The Bombay High Court issued notice to respondents (Maharashtra Government's Energy Department and electricity distribution companies) returnable on 29th June 2026. The Government's counsel waived notice, and the petitioner was directed to provide adequate copies of the petition to the registry for service. The matter was adjourned for further hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
01-Jun-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
29-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP/6945/2026
Case Summary: WP/6945/2026 The Bombay High Court issued notice to respondents (Maharashtra Government's Energy Department and electricity distribution companies) returnable on 29th June 2026. The Government's counsel waived notice, and the petitioner was directed to provide adequate copies of the petition to the registry for service. The matter was adjourned for further hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts