PARASHURAM NIVRUTTI JADHAV vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THRU SECRETARY AND ORS — WP/6962/2026

Case under Mah. Land Revenue Code, 1966 Section NA. Next hearing: 29th June 2026.

CNR: HCBM010258162026

Next Hearing

29th June 2026

Filing Number

WP/15068/2026

Filing Date

29-05-2026

Registration No

WP/6962/2026

Registration Date

29-05-2026

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHYAM C. CHANDAK , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE FARHAN PARVEZ DUBASH

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHYAM C. CHANDAK , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE FARHAN PARVEZ DUBASH

Bench Type

Division

Category

LAND ACQUISITION/REQUISITION(CENTRAL/STATE) ( 20 )

Sub-Category

NOTIFICATION/NOTICE ( 10 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Acts & Sections

Mah. Land Revenue Code, 1966 Section NA

Petitioner(s)

PARASHURAM NIVRUTTI JADHAV

Adv. ADV TANOJ JOSHI

Respondent(s)

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THRU SECRETARY AND ORS

THE SUPERINTENDENT OF LAND RECORDS (SLR)NASHIK

THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF LAND RECORDS (DYSLR)

THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE (SP)NASHIK DISTRICT RURAL POLICE

THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE/OFFICER-IN-CHARGE

VASUDEV RAMCHANDRA LALVANI

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHYAM C. CHANDAK , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE FARHAN PARVEZ DUBASH

01-06-2026

FOR CIRCULATION

29-06-2026

FOR CIRCULATION

Orders

01-06-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHYAM C. CHANDAK,HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE FARHAN PARVEZ DUBASH

The writ petition filed by Parashuram Nivrutti Jadhav against the State of Maharashtra and land records officials was adjourned by the Bombay High Court on 1st June 2026, with the case scheduled for next hearing on 29th June 2026. The petitioner appeared without representation while the State was represented by Additional Government Pleader. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The writ petition filed by Parashuram Nivrutti Jadhav against the State of Maharashtra and land records officials was adjourned by the Bombay High Court on 1st June 2026, with the case scheduled for next hearing on 29th June 2026. The petitioner appeared without representation while the State was represented by Additional Government Pleader. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case