KHAN AYESHA SIDDIQA ABUBAKAR vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THRU G P AND ORS — WP/6931/2026

Case under Mah. Regional Town Planning Act Section na. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 03rd June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM010257142026

Filing Number

WP/15024/2026

Filing Date

26-May-2026

Registration No

WP/6931/2026

Registration Date

29-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Shyam C. Chandak , Hon'ble Shri Justice Farhan Parvez Dubash

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Shyam C. Chandak , Hon'ble Shri Justice Farhan Parvez Dubash

Bench Type

Division

Category

TOWN PLANNING ( 39 )

Sub-Category

OTHERS ( 99 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

03-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Mah. Regional Town Planning Act Section na

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KHAN AYESHA SIDDIQA ABUBAKAR

    Adv. SHAIKH ABDUL AZIM

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THRU G P AND ORS

  2. 2.THE TAHSILDAR AND EXECUTIVE MAGISTRATE

  3. 3.THE TALATHI OFFICE KHADAVLI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 03-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Shyam C. Chandak,hon'ble Shri Justice Farhan Parvez DubashView PDF

    The Bombay High Court disposed of the writ petition by directing petitioner Khan Ayesha Siddiqa Abubakar to produce documents by June 9, 2026, establishing that a disputed structure is legally authorized, which the Tahsildar will then examine and decide within two weeks without taking coercive action. If the petitioner fails to produce documents, she agreed to self-demolish the structure within one week, or else the competent authority may demolish it under applicable law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 03-Jun-2026

    For Circulation

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Shyam C. Chandak , Hon'ble Shri Justice Farhan Parvez Dubash

  4. 26-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/6931/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court disposed of the writ petition by directing petitioner Khan Ayesha Siddiqa Abubakar to produce documents by June 9, 2026, establishing that a disputed structure is legally authorized, which the Tahsildar will then examine and decide within two weeks without taking coercive action. If the petitioner fails to produce documents, she agreed to self-demolish the structure within one week, or else the competent authority may demolish it under applicable law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case