Jatin Babubhai Shah SHAH MEET RAJESH vs THE DISTRICT DEPUTY REGISTRAR 4 Cooperative Societies — HCBM10257032026
Case under C.p.c.- (Interlocutory Order) Section 151. Next hearing: 12th June 2026.
CNR: HCBM010257032026
e-Filing Number
22-05-2026
Filing Number
IA/15019/2026
Filing Date
26-May-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Shyam C. Chandak
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Shyam C. Chandak
Bench Type
Single
Category
ORDINARY CIVIL ( 30 )
Sub-Category
OTHERS ( 99 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Last updated 04-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Jatin Babubhai Shah SHAH MEET RAJESH
-
2.Hitendra Babubhai Shah
Adv. SHAH MEET RAJESH
-
3.Manish Babubhai Shah
Adv. SHAH MEET RAJESH
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE DISTRICT DEPUTY REGISTRAR 4 Cooperative Societies
-
2.STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, Through the Principal Secretary, Cooperation, Marketing and Textile
-
3.COLLECTOR OF STAMPS, BORIVALI TALUKA
-
4.SUB REGISTRAR OF ASSURANCES, Borivali Talu
-
5.MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF GREATER MUMBAI, Through the Municipal Commissioner
-
6.RAMAN ASHISH COOPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY LTD
-
7.JAS CORPORATION
-
8.RASHMI BABUBHAI SHAH
Case History
-
12-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
12-Jun-2026
For Circulation
Hon'ble Shri Justice Shyam C. Chandak
-
03-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Shyam C. ChandakView PDF
Case Summary The Bombay High Court issued notice to respondents returnable on 12th June 2026 in this interim application filed by Jatin Babubhai Shah and others against the District Deputy Registrar of Co-Operative Societies and the State of Maharashtra. The court allowed the interim relief (hamdast) and permitted petitioners to serve private notice on respondents 5-8. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
03-Jun-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
26-May-2026
Case filed
Case Summary The Bombay High Court issued notice to respondents returnable on 12th June 2026 in this interim application filed by Jatin Babubhai Shah and others against the District Deputy Registrar of Co-Operative Societies and the State of Maharashtra. The court allowed the interim relief (hamdast) and permitted petitioners to serve private notice on respondents 5-8. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts