PATEL NARENDRAKUMAR TULSIBHAI AND ANR vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA — HCBM10257012026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226,227,12. Next hearing: 10th June 2026.
CNR: HCBM010257012026
Filing Number
WP/10684/2026
Filing Date
26-May-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Shyam C. Chandak , Hon'ble Shri Justice Shreeram Vinayak Shirsat
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Shyam C. Chandak , Hon'ble Shri Justice Shreeram Vinayak Shirsat
Bench Type
Division
Category
CRIMINAL ( 9 )
Sub-Category
482 Cr.P. C. / 528 BNSS Application other than Quashing and 156 (3) Cr.P.C./ 175(3) BNSS ( 115 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal
Last updated 30-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.PATEL NARENDRAKUMAR TULSIBHAI AND ANR
Adv. Vinod Shinde
-
2.PATEL VASANTKUMAR TULSIBHAI
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
-
2.COMPETENT AUTHORITY THROUGH OFFICE OF DEPUTY COLLECTOR LAND ACQUISITION
Case History
-
10-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
10-Jun-2026
For Circulation -1
Hon'ble Shri Justice Shyam C. Chandak , Hon'ble Shri Justice Shreeram Vinayak Shirsat
-
29-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Shyam C. Chandak,hon'ble Shri Justice Shreeram Vinayak ShirsatView PDF
Summary of WRIT PETITION (ST) NO. 10684 OF 2026 The Bombay High Court granted leave to amend the petition to add National Spot Exchange Limited (NSEL) as a respondent and issued notice returnable on 10th June 2026. The court granted ad-interim stay of property auction proceedings scheduled for 1st June 2026 due to ambiguity regarding which competent authority would conduct the auction following a prior court order directing appointment of a new competent authority. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
26-May-2026
Case filed
Summary of WRIT PETITION (ST) NO. 10684 OF 2026 The Bombay High Court granted leave to amend the petition to add National Spot Exchange Limited (NSEL) as a respondent and issued notice returnable on 10th June 2026. The court granted ad-interim stay of property auction proceedings scheduled for 1st June 2026 due to ambiguity regarding which competent authority would conduct the auction following a prior court order directing appointment of a new competent authority. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts