AMIT MUKESH KUMAR vs UNION OF INDIA THRU REPRESENTED — WP/6887/2026

Case under Central Civil Services Rules1964 Section NA. Next hearing: 19th June 2026.

Next hearing 19-Jun-2026

CNR: HCBM010256822026

Filing Number

WP/15015/2026

Filing Date

26-May-2026

Registration No

WP/6887/2026

Registration Date

28-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Shyam C. Chandak , Hon'ble Shri Justice Shreeram Vinayak Shirsat

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Shyam C. Chandak , Hon'ble Shri Justice Shreeram Vinayak Shirsat

Bench Type

Division

Category

OTHER SERVICE MATTERS ( 66 )

Sub-Category

ALL OTHER SERVICE MATTERS - DB ( 3 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Last updated 30-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Central Civil Services Rules1964 Section NA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.AMIT MUKESH KUMAR

    Adv. Balkrishna Pathak

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.UNION OF INDIA THRU REPRESENTED

Case History

  1. 19-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 19-Jun-2026

    For Circulation

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Shyam C. Chandak , Hon'ble Shri Justice Shreeram Vinayak Shirsat

  3. 29-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Shyam C. Chandak,hon'ble Shri Justice Shreeram Vinayak ShirsatView PDF

    Case Summary: WP/6887/2026 Amit Mukesh Kumar, a temporary employee at Bhabha Atomic Research Centre for 18 months, challenged his termination notice dated 22.05.2026. The Respondent sought to terminate him solely for failing to supply a Caste Certificate, despite him fulfilling all other requirements. The Bombay High Court granted an ad interim stay on the termination, restraining the institute from terminating his traineeship. The case is adjourned to 19th June 2026 for further hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 29-May-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 26-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/6887/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP/6887/2026 Amit Mukesh Kumar, a temporary employee at Bhabha Atomic Research Centre for 18 months, challenged his termination notice dated 22.05.2026. The Respondent sought to terminate him solely for failing to supply a Caste Certificate, despite him fulfilling all other requirements. The Bombay High Court granted an ad interim stay on the termination, restraining the institute from terminating his traineeship. The case is adjourned to 19th June 2026 for further hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case