MR. PUSHPARAJA VIRAN S/O. MARIMUTHU VIRAN AND OTHERS vs THE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF MUMBAI AND ANOTHER — HCBM10256372026

Case under Bombay Municipal Corporation Act. Next hearing: 13th July 2026.

Next hearing 13-Jul-2026

CNR: HCBM010256372026

Filing Number

AO/14996/2026

Filing Date

25-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Justice Sharmila U. Deshmukh

Coram

Hon'ble Justice Sharmila U. Deshmukh

Bench Type

Single

Category

ELECTION ( 12 )

Sub-Category

MUNICIPAL CORPORATION ( 7 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bombay Municipal Corporation Act

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MR. PUSHPARAJA VIRAN S/O. MARIMUTHU VIRAN AND OTHERS

    Adv. Jagdish Narayanrao Jayale

  2. 2.MR. ANAND GANGARAM DALVI

  3. 3.MR. EDWIN MENDONCA

  4. 4.MRS. SHAIKH AYESH W/O. MOHBOOB SAHEB

  5. 5.MRS. DEVYANI SITARAM MANIK THR HER CONSTITUTED ATTORNEY SITARAM HIRA MANIK

  6. 6.MR MOHAMMED AHMED USMAN LAKDAWALA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF MUMBAI AND ANOTHER

  2. 2.THE DESIGNATED OFFICER I,II,III AND IV BUILDING AND FACTORY DEPTT.

Case History

  1. 13-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 13-Jul-2026

    For Admission

    Hon'ble Justice Sharmila U. Deshmukh

  3. 09-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Sharmila U. DeshmukhView PDF

    The High Court of Bombay adjourned the appeal filed by Pushparaja Viran and others against the Municipal Corporation of Mumbai to July 13, 2026, granting the respondent's counsel time to obtain instructions. The ad-interim relief previously granted to the appellants was continued until the next hearing date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 09-Jun-2026

    For Circulation

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Shreeram Vinayak Shirsat

  5. 28-May-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 25-May-2026

    Case filed

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Bombay adjourned the appeal filed by Pushparaja Viran and others against the Municipal Corporation of Mumbai to July 13, 2026, granting the respondent's counsel time to obtain instructions. The ad-interim relief previously granted to the appellants was continued until the next hearing date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case