MR. VIJAY KEHSAV JUVEKAR(Legal Heir) vs MR. RAJAN CHANDRAKANT JUVEKAR AND ORS. Advocate - Sainand Chaugule, FOR RESPONDENT NO.1,FOR RESP. NO. 3,ADV. OMKAR NAGWEKAR FOR R. NO. 1, ,CAVEAT & V.P. FILED.,GEETA MULEKAR,Patil Kalpesh Uttam — FA/1641/2019

Case under C.p.c.- (Non-interlocutory Order) Section 96. Next hearing: 15th June 2026.

Next hearing 15-Jun-2026

CNR: HCBM010256302018

Filing Number

FA/16266/2018

Filing Date

11-Jun-2018

Registration No

FA/1641/2019

Registration Date

19-Nov-2019

Judge

Dr.M.S. Deshpande, Registrar (Judicial - II)

Coram

Dr.M.S. Deshpande, Registrar (Judicial - II)

Bench Type

Single

Category

ORDINARY CIVIL ( 30 )

Sub-Category

ORDINARY CIVIL ( 11 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Last updated 12-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

C.p.c.- (Non-interlocutory Order) Section 96

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MR. VIJAY KEHSAV JUVEKAR(Legal Heir)

    Adv. Satish S Raut 1.

  2. 2.1A. Vaishali Vijay Juvekar1.

  3. 3.1B. Vishal Vijay Juvekar1.

  4. 4.1C. Paneri Vijay Juvekar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MR. RAJAN CHANDRAKANT JUVEKAR AND ORS. Advocate - Sainand Chaugule, FOR RESPONDENT NO.1,FOR RESP. NO. 3,ADV. OMKAR NAGWEKAR FOR R. NO. 1, ,CAVEAT & V.P. FILED.,GEETA MULEKAR,Patil Kalpesh Uttam

  2. 2.THE MUMBAI BUILDING REPAIR AND RECONSTRUCTION BOARD

  3. 3.THE MAHARASHTRA HOUSING AND ARA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Case History

  1. 15-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 15-Jun-2026

    For Orders (Spare Copy/Ies Not Supplied)

    Dr.M.S. Deshpande, Registrar (Judicial - II)

  3. 07-May-2026

    Dr.M.S. Deshpande, Registrar (Judicial - II)View PDF

    Case Summary: FA/1641/2019 The Bombay High Court's Registrar granted the appellant's advocate a final 2-week extension (excluding summer vacation) to supply necessary copies for issuing notices to respondents 2 and 3. The court warned that failure to comply will result in automatic dismissal of the First Appeal and any related Civil Applications against those respondents without further notice, as the prescribed timeline under Bombay High Court Appellate Side Rules, 1960 had already expired despite a prior 2-week extension being granted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 12-Dec-2025

    For Orders (Spare Copy/Ies Not Supplied)

    Shri. S.R. Agrawal, Registrar(Judl II)

  5. 28-Nov-2025

    Shri. S.R. Agrawal, Registrar(Judl II)View PDF

  6. 28-Nov-2025

    For Orders (Spare Copy/Ies Not Supplied)

    Shri. S.R. Agrawal, Registrar(Judl II)

  7. 14-Nov-2025

    Shri. S.R. Agrawal, Registrar(Judl II)View PDF

  8. 14-Oct-2025

    For Admission

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Jitendra Shantilal Jain

  9. 18-Aug-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice M. M. SathayeView PDF

  10. 09-Apr-2025

    Hon'ble Justice Sharmila U. DeshmukhView PDF

  11. 09-Apr-2025

    For Admission

    Hon'ble Justice Sharmila U. Deshmukh

  12. 26-Mar-2025

    Hon'ble Justice Sharmila U. DeshmukhView PDF

  13. 01-Apr-2024

    For Circulation

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Kishore C. Sant

  14. 22-Mar-2024

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Kishore C. SantView PDF

  15. 18-Dec-2020

    For Admission - Fresh (First Appeals)

    Hon'ble Smt. Justice Bharati Dangre

  16. 14-Jan-2020

    Hon'ble Shri Justice R.D. DhanukaView PDF

  17. 14-Jan-2020

    For Circulation[civil Side]

    Hon'ble Shri Justice R.D. Dhanuka

  18. 09-Dec-2019

    Hon'ble Shri Justice R.D. DhanukaView PDF

  19. 09-Dec-2019

    For Speaking To The Minutes [Civil Side Matters]

    Hon'ble Shri Justice R.D. Dhanuka

  20. 27-Nov-2019

    Hon'ble Shri Justice R.D. DhanukaView PDF

  21. 27-Nov-2019

    For Production

    Hon'ble Shri Justice R.D. Dhanuka

  22. 15-Oct-2019

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  23. 29-Jan-2019

    —View PDF

  24. 08-Jan-2019

    —View PDF

  25. 10-Dec-2018

    —View PDF

  26. 31-Oct-2018

    —View PDF

  27. 03-Oct-2018

    —View PDF

  28. 05-Sep-2018

    —View PDF

  29. 11-Jun-2018

    Case filed

    Registration No. FA/1641/2019

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: FA/1641/2019 The Bombay High Court's Registrar granted the appellant's advocate a final 2-week extension (excluding summer vacation) to supply necessary copies for issuing notices to respondents 2 and 3. The court warned that failure to comply will result in automatic dismissal of the First Appeal and any related Civil Applications against those respondents without further notice, as the prescribed timeline under Bombay High Court Appellate Side Rules, 1960 had already expired despite a prior 2-week extension being granted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case