DILJIT SINGH MANJIT SINGH LABANA vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA — ABA/1409/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 29th May 2026.

CNR: HCBM010255882026

CASE DISPOSED

Filing Number

ABA/10610/2026

Filing Date

25-05-2026

Registration No

ABA/1409/2026

Registration Date

25-05-2026

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHYAM C. CHANDAK

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHYAM C. CHANDAK

Bench Type

Single

Category

BAIL ( 51 )

Sub-Category

Anticipatory ( 2 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal

Decision Date

29th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 109,115(2),352,3(5)
Police Act (Maharashtra) Section 37(1),135

Petitioner(s)

DILJIT SINGH MANJIT SINGH LABANA

Adv. Saili Dhuru

Respondent(s)

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHYAM C. CHANDAK

29-05-2026

FOR CIRCULATION -1

Orders

29-05-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHYAM C. CHANDAK

Case Summary: ABA/1409/2026 The Bombay High Court granted anticipatory bail to Diljit Singh Manjit Singh Labana in a stabbing case. Although charged with attempt to murder (Section 109 BNS 2023) following a December 2025 road rage incident where he allegedly stabbed the informant, the court found CCTV evidence showed the assault was spontaneous and unpremeditated—occurring during a sudden scuffle rather than being planned. Since the weapon was already seized and custodial interrogation was unnecessary, bail was permitted on Rs. 50,000 bond with conditions including monthly police attendance and no witness tampering. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: ABA/1409/2026 The Bombay High Court granted anticipatory bail to Diljit Singh Manjit Singh Labana in a stabbing case. Although charged with attempt to murder (Section 109 BNS 2023) following a December 2025 road rage incident where he allegedly stabbed the informant, the court found CCTV evidence showed the assault was spontaneous and unpremeditated—occurring during a sudden scuffle rather than being planned. Since the weapon was already seized and custodial interrogation was unnecessary, bail was permitted on Rs. 50,000 bond with conditions including monthly police attendance and no witness tampering. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case