SHAILENDRA SURENDRABHAI RATHOD vs THE SENIOR POLICE INSPECTOR AND ORS — APEAL/447/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 415. Next hearing: 06th August 2026.
CNR: HCBM010255822026
Next Hearing
06th August 2026
Filing Number
APEAL/10606/2026
Filing Date
25-05-2026
Registration No
APEAL/447/2026
Registration Date
25-05-2026
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE N. J. JAMADAR
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE N. J. JAMADAR
Bench Type
Single
Category
CRIMINAL APPEAL ( 58 )
Sub-Category
Against Conviction - By Convicted Person - on Bail ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SHAILENDRA SURENDRABHAI RATHOD
Adv. Mateen Shaikh
Respondent(s)
THE SENIOR POLICE INSPECTOR AND ORS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
X.Y.Z.
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE N. J. JAMADAR
FRESH ADMISSION
FRESH ADMISSION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-06-2026 | FRESH ADMISSION |
| 06-08-2026 | FRESH ADMISSION |
Orders
Case Summary: APEAL/447/2026 Outcome: The Interim Application for suspension of sentence was allowed. The three-year rigorous imprisonment sentence imposed on appellant Shailendra Surendrabhai Rathod (for Section 323 IPC conviction in a POCSO case) stands suspended pending final appeal disposal. The appellant was released on bail upon furnishing a PR Bond of Rs.15,000 and a surety or cash security of the same amount. The High Court found the trial judge committed a legal error by refusing to grant set-off credit for six months already served as an under-trial prisoner, which is mandatory under Section 468 BNSS. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: APEAL/447/2026 Outcome: The Interim Application for suspension of sentence was allowed. The three-year rigorous imprisonment sentence imposed on appellant Shailendra Surendrabhai Rathod (for Section 323 IPC conviction in a POCSO case) stands suspended pending final appeal disposal. The appellant was released on bail upon furnishing a PR Bond of Rs.15,000 and a surety or cash security of the same amount. The High Court found the trial judge committed a legal error by refusing to grant set-off credit for six months already served as an under-trial prisoner, which is mandatory under Section 468 BNSS. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts