SHAILENDRA SURENDRABHAI RATHOD vs THE SENIOR POLICE INSPECTOR AND ORS — APEAL/447/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 415. Next hearing: 06th August 2026.
CNR: HCBM010255822026
Filing Number
APEAL/10606/2026
Filing Date
25-May-2026
Registration No
APEAL/447/2026
Registration Date
25-May-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice N. J. Jamadar
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice N. J. Jamadar
Bench Type
Single
Category
CRIMINAL APPEAL ( 58 )
Sub-Category
Against Conviction - By Convicted Person - on Bail ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal
Last updated 14-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SHAILENDRA SURENDRABHAI RATHOD
Adv. Mateen Shaikh
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE SENIOR POLICE INSPECTOR AND ORS
-
2.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
-
3.X.Y.Z.
Case History
-
06-Aug-2026
Next hearingPending
-
06-Aug-2026
Fresh Admission
Hon'ble Shri Justice N. J. Jamadar
-
12-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice N. J. JamadarView PDF
Case Summary: APEAL/447/2026 Outcome: The Interim Application for suspension of sentence was allowed. The three-year rigorous imprisonment sentence imposed on appellant Shailendra Surendrabhai Rathod (for Section 323 IPC conviction in a POCSO case) stands suspended pending final appeal disposal. The appellant was released on bail upon furnishing a PR Bond of Rs.15,000 and a surety or cash security of the same amount. The High Court found the trial judge committed a legal error by refusing to grant set-off credit for six months already served as an under-trial prisoner, which is mandatory under Section 468 BNSS. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
12-Jun-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
25-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. APEAL/447/2026
Case Summary: APEAL/447/2026 Outcome: The Interim Application for suspension of sentence was allowed. The three-year rigorous imprisonment sentence imposed on appellant Shailendra Surendrabhai Rathod (for Section 323 IPC conviction in a POCSO case) stands suspended pending final appeal disposal. The appellant was released on bail upon furnishing a PR Bond of Rs.15,000 and a surety or cash security of the same amount. The High Court found the trial judge committed a legal error by refusing to grant set-off credit for six months already served as an under-trial prisoner, which is mandatory under Section 468 BNSS. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts