AMIT BHANUSHEKHAR JAMSANDEKAR vs SMT. MEENTU MANGESH JAMSANDEKAR AND ANR — IA/3815/2026

Case under C.p.c.- (Interlocutory Order) Section 104. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 08th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM010255732026

Filing Number

IA/14972/2026

Filing Date

22-May-2026

Registration No

IA/3815/2026

Registration Date

03-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. Jadhav

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. Jadhav

Bench Type

Single

Category

CIVIL APPEALS ( 45 )

Sub-Category

Single Bench Matters ( 2 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

08-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

C.p.c.- (Interlocutory Order) Section 104

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.AMIT BHANUSHEKHAR JAMSANDEKAR

    Adv. SHUBHAM

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SMT. MEENTU MANGESH JAMSANDEKAR AND ANR

  2. 2.POOJA MANGESH JAMSANDEKAR NEE POOJA SOMENDRA TAJNE

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. JadhavView PDF

    The Bombay High Court dismissed Amit Bhanushekhar Jamsandekar's interim application seeking directions from the appellate court regarding repairs to suit premises. The court found that the defendant's request was improper—after his earlier repair application was dismissed by the trial court and a subsequent writ petition was disposed of by the high court on 27.07.2022, seeking further directions from the appellate court was unprecedented practice. The court directed the defendant to pursue any grievance through appropriate application before the trial court where the suit is pending, expressly preserving his right to do so. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-Jun-2026

    For Admission

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. Jadhav

  4. 22-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. IA/3815/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court dismissed Amit Bhanushekhar Jamsandekar's interim application seeking directions from the appellate court regarding repairs to suit premises. The court found that the defendant's request was improper—after his earlier repair application was dismissed by the trial court and a subsequent writ petition was disposed of by the high court on 27.07.2022, seeking further directions from the appellate court was unprecedented practice. The court directed the defendant to pursue any grievance through appropriate application before the trial court where the suit is pending, expressly preserving his right to do so. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case