AMIT BHANUSHEKHAR JAMSANDEKAR vs SMT. MEENTU MANGESH JAMSANDEKAR AND ANR — IA/3815/2026
Case under C.p.c.- (Interlocutory Order) Section 104. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 08th June 2026.
CNR: HCBM010255732026
Filing Number
IA/14972/2026
Filing Date
22-05-2026
Registration No
IA/3815/2026
Registration Date
03-06-2026
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MILIND N. JADHAV
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MILIND N. JADHAV
Bench Type
Single
Category
CIVIL APPEALS ( 45 )
Sub-Category
Single Bench Matters ( 2 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
08th June 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
AMIT BHANUSHEKHAR JAMSANDEKAR
Adv. SHUBHAM
Respondent(s)
SMT. MEENTU MANGESH JAMSANDEKAR AND ANR
POOJA MANGESH JAMSANDEKAR NEE POOJA SOMENDRA TAJNE
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MILIND N. JADHAV
FOR ADMISSION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 08-06-2026 | FOR ADMISSION |
Orders
The Bombay High Court dismissed Amit Bhanushekhar Jamsandekar's interim application seeking directions from the appellate court regarding repairs to suit premises. The court found that the defendant's request was improper—after his earlier repair application was dismissed by the trial court and a subsequent writ petition was disposed of by the high court on 27.07.2022, seeking further directions from the appellate court was unprecedented practice. The court directed the defendant to pursue any grievance through appropriate application before the trial court where the suit is pending, expressly preserving his right to do so. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Bombay High Court dismissed Amit Bhanushekhar Jamsandekar's interim application seeking directions from the appellate court regarding repairs to suit premises. The court found that the defendant's request was improper—after his earlier repair application was dismissed by the trial court and a subsequent writ petition was disposed of by the high court on 27.07.2022, seeking further directions from the appellate court was unprecedented practice. The court directed the defendant to pursue any grievance through appropriate application before the trial court where the suit is pending, expressly preserving his right to do so. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts