IKRAMUDDIN ASLAM SOLANKI vs INDIAN BANK AND ANR — WP/6828/2026

Case under Securitisation & Reconstruction of Finiancial Assets Act Section NA. Next hearing: 18th June 2026.

Next hearing 18-Jun-2026

CNR: HCBM010255642026

Filing Number

WP/14971/2026

Filing Date

22-May-2026

Registration No

WP/6828/2026

Registration Date

25-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Shyam C. Chandak , Hon'ble Shri Justice Farhan Parvez Dubash

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Shyam C. Chandak , Hon'ble Shri Justice Farhan Parvez Dubash

Bench Type

Division

Category

MERCANTILE LAWS COMMERCIAL TRANSACTIONS , BANKS ( 28 )

Sub-Category

FINANCIAL CORPORATION OTHER THAN BANK ( 9 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Securitisation & Reconstruction of Finiancial Assets Act Section NA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.IKRAMUDDIN ASLAM SOLANKI

    Adv. JP Jayswal

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.INDIAN BANK AND ANR

  2. 2.MANSUKH BAVJI PATEL

Case History

  1. 18-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 18-Jun-2026

    For Circulation

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Shyam C. Chandak , Hon'ble Shri Justice Farhan Parvez Dubash

  3. 03-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Shyam C. Chandak,hon'ble Shri Justice Farhan Parvez DubashView PDF

    Case Summary: The Bombay High Court issued notice to respondents Indian Bank and Mansukh Bavji Patel in Ikramuddin Aslam Solanki's writ petition, returnable on 18th June 2026. The petitioner was permitted to serve the respondents by private service, and the case was adjourned to allow the respondents to file their response. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 03-Jun-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 22-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/6828/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: The Bombay High Court issued notice to respondents Indian Bank and Mansukh Bavji Patel in Ikramuddin Aslam Solanki's writ petition, returnable on 18th June 2026. The petitioner was permitted to serve the respondents by private service, and the case was adjourned to allow the respondents to file their response. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case