AKSHAY MANE AND ORS vs AMIT SAHADEV HARALE — IA/3660/2026

Case under Mah. Universities Act, 1994 Section 226. Disposed: --Allowed on 20th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM010253102026

Filing Number

IA/14859/2026

Filing Date

19-May-2026

Registration No

IA/3660/2026

Registration Date

19-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Gautam A. Ankhad , Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandesh Dadasaheb Patil

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Gautam A. Ankhad , Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandesh Dadasaheb Patil

Bench Type

Division

Category

EDUCATION ( 11 )

Sub-Category

ADMISSION ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

20-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--Allowed

Last updated 29-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Mah. Universities Act, 1994 Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.AKSHAY MANE AND ORS

    Adv. Sohan Gunjal

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.AMIT SAHADEV HARALE

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 20-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Gautam A. Ankhad,hon'ble Shri Justice Sandesh Dadasaheb PatilView PDF

    Case Summary: IA/3660/2026 Court Decision: The Bombay High Court granted interim relief to students (Akshay Mane and others) who obtained provisional fourth-year admission despite pending second-year backlog exams. The court directed Savitribai Phule Pune University to accept their examination forms and permit them to appear for May 2026 exams, with the university completing eligibility verification within 24 hours. However, their exam results remain subject to the final outcome of the underlying writ petition challenging the "carry on" system's legality. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 19-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. IA/3660/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: IA/3660/2026 Court Decision: The Bombay High Court granted interim relief to students (Akshay Mane and others) who obtained provisional fourth-year admission despite pending second-year backlog exams. The court directed Savitribai Phule Pune University to accept their examination forms and permit them to appear for May 2026 exams, with the university completing eligibility verification within 24 hours. However, their exam results remain subject to the final outcome of the underlying writ petition challenging the "carry on" system's legality. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case