AKSHAY MANE AND ORS vs AMIT SAHADEV HARALE — IA/3660/2026

Case under Mah. Universities Act, 1994 Section 226. Disposed: --Allowed on 20th May 2026.

CNR: HCBM010253102026

CASE DISPOSED

Filing Number

IA/14859/2026

Filing Date

19-05-2026

Registration No

IA/3660/2026

Registration Date

19-05-2026

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE GAUTAM A. ANKHAD , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDESH DADASAHEB PATIL

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE GAUTAM A. ANKHAD , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDESH DADASAHEB PATIL

Bench Type

Division

Category

EDUCATION ( 11 )

Sub-Category

ADMISSION ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

20th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

--Allowed

Acts & Sections

Mah. Universities Act, 1994 Section 226

Petitioner(s)

AKSHAY MANE AND ORS

Adv. Sohan Gunjal

Respondent(s)

AMIT SAHADEV HARALE

Orders

20-05-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE GAUTAM A. ANKHAD,HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDESH DADASAHEB PATIL

Case Summary: IA/3660/2026 Court Decision: The Bombay High Court granted interim relief to students (Akshay Mane and others) who obtained provisional fourth-year admission despite pending second-year backlog exams. The court directed Savitribai Phule Pune University to accept their examination forms and permit them to appear for May 2026 exams, with the university completing eligibility verification within 24 hours. However, their exam results remain subject to the final outcome of the underlying writ petition challenging the "carry on" system's legality. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: IA/3660/2026 Court Decision: The Bombay High Court granted interim relief to students (Akshay Mane and others) who obtained provisional fourth-year admission despite pending second-year backlog exams. The court directed Savitribai Phule Pune University to accept their examination forms and permit them to appear for May 2026 exams, with the university completing eligibility verification within 24 hours. However, their exam results remain subject to the final outcome of the underlying writ petition challenging the "carry on" system's legality. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case