SATINDER SINGH BACHHER vs RAJESH D RAMBHIA (HUF) AND ANR — APL/1010/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 528. Next hearing: 08th June 2026.
CNR: HCBM010252882026
Filing Number
APL/10444/2026
Filing Date
18-May-2026
Registration No
APL/1010/2026
Registration Date
19-May-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Shreeram Vinayak Shirsat
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Shreeram Vinayak Shirsat
Bench Type
Single
Category
CRIMINAL ( 9 )
Sub-Category
CHEQUE DISHONOUR ( 12 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal
Last updated 30-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SATINDER SINGH BACHHER
Adv. Diwakar Gond
Respondent(s)
-
1.RAJESH D RAMBHIA (HUF) AND ANR
-
2.STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
Case History
-
08-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
08-Jun-2026
For Circulation -1
Hon'ble Shri Justice Shreeram Vinayak Shirsat
-
29-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Shreeram Vinayak ShirsatView PDF
Case Summary: APL/1010/2026 Satinder Singh Bachher, convicted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and sentenced to six months imprisonment plus ₹10 lakh compensation, challenged the Sessions Court's condition requiring 25% deposit of compensation as a prerequisite for sentence suspension. The High Court rejected his request to waive or reduce the deposit amount, finding no exceptional circumstances warranting interference. However, considering his heart ailment and medical advice for rest, the court extended the deposit deadline by four weeks from May 29, 2026. All other conditions regarding appeal attendance and expeditious disposal remain unchanged, with no further extensions permitted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
29-May-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
18-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. APL/1010/2026
Case Summary: APL/1010/2026 Satinder Singh Bachher, convicted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and sentenced to six months imprisonment plus ₹10 lakh compensation, challenged the Sessions Court's condition requiring 25% deposit of compensation as a prerequisite for sentence suspension. The High Court rejected his request to waive or reduce the deposit amount, finding no exceptional circumstances warranting interference. However, considering his heart ailment and medical advice for rest, the court extended the deposit deadline by four weeks from May 29, 2026. All other conditions regarding appeal attendance and expeditious disposal remain unchanged, with no further extensions permitted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts