SATINDER SINGH BACHHER vs RAJESH D RAMBHIA (HUF) AND ANR — APL/1010/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 528. Next hearing: 08th June 2026.

CNR: HCBM010252882026

Next Hearing

08th June 2026

Filing Number

APL/10444/2026

Filing Date

18-05-2026

Registration No

APL/1010/2026

Registration Date

19-05-2026

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHREERAM VINAYAK SHIRSAT

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHREERAM VINAYAK SHIRSAT

Bench Type

Single

Category

CRIMINAL ( 9 )

Sub-Category

CHEQUE DISHONOUR ( 12 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 528
Criminal Procedure Code (Cr.pc) Section 482
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

SATINDER SINGH BACHHER

Adv. Diwakar Gond

Respondent(s)

RAJESH D RAMBHIA (HUF) AND ANR

STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHREERAM VINAYAK SHIRSAT

29-05-2026

FOR CIRCULATION -1

08-06-2026

FOR CIRCULATION -1

Orders

29-05-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHREERAM VINAYAK SHIRSAT

Case Summary: APL/1010/2026 Satinder Singh Bachher, convicted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and sentenced to six months imprisonment plus ₹10 lakh compensation, challenged the Sessions Court's condition requiring 25% deposit of compensation as a prerequisite for sentence suspension. The High Court rejected his request to waive or reduce the deposit amount, finding no exceptional circumstances warranting interference. However, considering his heart ailment and medical advice for rest, the court extended the deposit deadline by four weeks from May 29, 2026. All other conditions regarding appeal attendance and expeditious disposal remain unchanged, with no further extensions permitted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: APL/1010/2026 Satinder Singh Bachher, convicted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and sentenced to six months imprisonment plus ₹10 lakh compensation, challenged the Sessions Court's condition requiring 25% deposit of compensation as a prerequisite for sentence suspension. The High Court rejected his request to waive or reduce the deposit amount, finding no exceptional circumstances warranting interference. However, considering his heart ailment and medical advice for rest, the court extended the deposit deadline by four weeks from May 29, 2026. All other conditions regarding appeal attendance and expeditious disposal remain unchanged, with no further extensions permitted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case