SHRI ASHOKKUMAR TRILOKCHAND BHATIA SHRI CHANDANA SALGAONKAR, RADIA,SHRI. PETER LOBO,SHRI R.A. THORAT vs SMT. SARASWATI TRILOKCHAND BHATIA and ORS. — WP/2323/2000

Case under Rent Act. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 26th March 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 12-Dec-2005

CNR: HCBM010252192000

Filing Number

WP/14088/2000

Filing Date

08-Apr-2003

Registration No

WP/2323/2000

Registration Date

28-Apr-2000

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Rajesh S. Patil

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Rajesh S. Patil

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

26-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 19-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Rent Act

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SHRI ASHOKKUMAR TRILOKCHAND BHATIA SHRI CHANDANA SALGAONKAR, RADIA,SHRI. PETER LOBO,SHRI R.A. THORAT

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SMT. SARASWATI TRILOKCHAND BHATIA and ORS.

    Adv. SMT.UMA G.WAGLE,FOR R.NO.1,FOR R.NO. 1.,[ CAVEAT & V.P. FILED ],SHRI NITIN JAMDAR FOR 2.,SMT. UMA G. WAGLE,FOR R.NO. 1,SHRI LALIT V. JOSHI 1123

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 26-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Rajesh S. PatilView PDF

    The Bombay High Court disposed of the writ petition as infructuous because it challenged an interim order in a suit that has since been finally disposed of, rendering the petition's subject matter moot. The court found no utility in proceeding with the petition once the underlying suit reached its conclusion. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Dec-2005

    Rent Act Warn List

    Hon'ble The Acting Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice D.B. Bhosale

  4. 08-Apr-2003

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/2323/2000

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court disposed of the writ petition as infructuous because it challenged an interim order in a suit that has since been finally disposed of, rendering the petition's subject matter moot. The court found no utility in proceeding with the petition once the underlying suit reached its conclusion. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case