PEER ALI JAMEEL SHAH vs MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF GREATER MUMBAI — HCBM10252172026
Case under Bombay Municipal Corporation Act. Next hearing: 15th June 2026.
CNR: HCBM010252172026
Filing Number
AO/14831/2026
Filing Date
15-May-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Gautam A. Ankhad
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Gautam A. Ankhad
Bench Type
Single
Category
ELECTION ( 12 )
Sub-Category
MUNICIPAL CORPORATION ( 7 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Last updated 29-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.PEER ALI JAMEEL SHAH
Adv. YMK Legal
Respondent(s)
-
1.MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF GREATER MUMBAI
Case History
-
15-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
15-Jun-2026
For Circulation
Hon'ble Shri Justice Gautam A. Ankhad
-
20-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Gautam A. AnkhadView PDF
CASE SUMMARY: The High Court of Bombay granted limited ad-interim protection to appellant Peer Ali Jameel Shah, restraining MCGM from taking coercive action against his properties (Unit Nos. A-3 and A-103) until the next hearing on 15th June 2026. The Court found the municipal notice dated 18th March 2026 vague and deficient in material particulars, and upheld the appellant's reasonable apprehension of unlawful demolition action despite the notice pertaining only to an adjacent shop. MCGM must file its affidavit-in-reply by 12th June 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
20-May-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
15-May-2026
Case filed
CASE SUMMARY: The High Court of Bombay granted limited ad-interim protection to appellant Peer Ali Jameel Shah, restraining MCGM from taking coercive action against his properties (Unit Nos. A-3 and A-103) until the next hearing on 15th June 2026. The Court found the municipal notice dated 18th March 2026 vague and deficient in material particulars, and upheld the appellant's reasonable apprehension of unlawful demolition action despite the notice pertaining only to an adjacent shop. MCGM must file its affidavit-in-reply by 12th June 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts