Dhananjay Krishnanath Gaikwad vs Gaurav Ashok Adukia — WP/7157/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226and227. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 12th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM010251682026

e-Filing Number

11-05-2026

Filing Number

WP/14807/2026

Filing Date

14-May-2026

Registration No

WP/7157/2026

Registration Date

08-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale , Hon'ble Shri Justice Shreeram Vinayak Shirsat

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale , Hon'ble Shri Justice Shreeram Vinayak Shirsat

Bench Type

Division

Category

ORDINARY CIVIL ( 30 )

Sub-Category

OTHERS ( 99 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

12-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226and227

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Dhananjay Krishnanath Gaikwad

    Adv. Nicky Pokar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Gaurav Ashok Adukia

  2. 2.National Company Law Tribunal Mumbai Bench Through the Ld Registrar

  3. 3.National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Through the Ld Registrar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale,hon'ble Shri Justice Shreeram Vinayak ShirsatView PDF

    Case Summary: WP/7157/2026 The Bombay High Court dismissed the writ petition filed by Dhananjay Krishnanath Gaikwad, a former director of a corporate debtor, challenging NCLT and NCLAT orders. The court held that the petitioner's challenge to the substantive findings and statutory interpretation by these tribunals cannot be entertained under Article 226 when an efficacious statutory remedy—an appeal under Section 62 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code to the Supreme Court—is available, through which all grounds can be raised. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Jun-2026

    Fresh Admission

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale , Hon'ble Shri Justice Shreeram Vinayak Shirsat

  4. 14-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/7157/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP/7157/2026 The Bombay High Court dismissed the writ petition filed by Dhananjay Krishnanath Gaikwad, a former director of a corporate debtor, challenging NCLT and NCLAT orders. The court held that the petitioner's challenge to the substantive findings and statutory interpretation by these tribunals cannot be entertained under Article 226 when an efficacious statutory remedy—an appeal under Section 62 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code to the Supreme Court—is available, through which all grounds can be raised. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case