PALLAVI TRADING COMPANY AND ANR. vs ANNA BHAGUJI KUSHARE — SA/938/2016
Case under Code of Civil Procedure 1908 Section 100. Next hearing: : -.
CNR: HCBM010251482016
Next Hearing
: -
Filing Number
SA/16749/2016
Filing Date
18-06-2016
Registration No
SA/938/2016
Registration Date
16-12-2016
Judge
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE GAURI GODSE
Coram
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE GAURI GODSE
Bench Type
Single
Category
ORDINARY CIVIL ( 30 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
PALLAVI TRADING COMPANY AND ANR.
Adv. JJ Associates
PRITAM BABULAL SURANA
Respondent(s)
ANNA BHAGUJI KUSHARE
Adv. VP. FOR RES. 1,JAGDISH ARADWAD REDDY 1123
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE GAURI GODSE
FOR ADMISSION
FOR ADMISSION
FOR CIRCULATION
FOR ADMISSION - AFTER NOTICE CIVIL SIDE MATTERS
FOR ADMISSION - AFTER NOTICE CIVIL SIDE MATTERS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 05-01-2017 | FOR ADMISSION |
| 21-04-2026 | FOR ADMISSION |
| 13-06-2022 | FOR CIRCULATION |
| 26-10-2020 | FOR ADMISSION - AFTER NOTICE CIVIL SIDE MATTERS |
| 29-01-2018 | FOR ADMISSION - AFTER NOTICE CIVIL SIDE MATTERS |
Orders
Case Summary: SA/938/2016 The Bombay High Court admitted the second appeal on substantial questions of law regarding whether paragraph 26 of the written statement can be treated as a counter claim without proper valuation and court fee payment. The court granted interim stay of the first appellate court's decree (which had reversed the trial court's judgment and directed the plaintiff to refund the amount) pending appeal resolution, protecting the plaintiff's interests during the second appeal proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: SA/938/2016 The Bombay High Court admitted the second appeal on substantial questions of law regarding whether paragraph 26 of the written statement can be treated as a counter claim without proper valuation and court fee payment. The court granted interim stay of the first appellate court's decree (which had reversed the trial court's judgment and directed the plaintiff to refund the amount) pending appeal resolution, protecting the plaintiff's interests during the second appeal proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts