THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER GOVERNMENT PLEADER AS vs JANARADAN CHANDAR PATIL — HCBM10250602025
Case under Land Acquisition Act Section 54. Next hearing: 09th June 2026.
CNR: HCBM010250602025
e-Filing Number
29-04-2025
Filing Number
FA/15944/2025
Filing Date
30-Apr-2025
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit Borkar
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit Borkar
Bench Type
Single
Category
FIRST APPEAL ( 53 )
Sub-Category
Land Aquisition - Single Bench ( 2 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Last updated 11-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER GOVERNMENT PLEADER AS
Respondent(s)
-
1.JANARADAN CHANDAR PATIL
-
2.RAMCHANDRA CHANDAR PATIL
Adv. Sachin Suryakant Punde
-
3.SULOCHANA MADHUKAR DHUMAL
Adv. Sachin Suryakant Punde
Case History
-
09-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
09-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit BorkarView PDF
Case Summary: The Bombay High Court dismissed the Special Land Acquisition Officer's appeal for condonation of a 264-day delay in filing. The court found the State's explanation regarding administrative procedures and inter-departmental approvals insufficient, particularly noting a large unexplained gap from May 2019 to December 2024. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed, the respondent claimant's decree awarding compensation at Rs.1,380/- per square metre remains operative, and the claimant may proceed with execution proceedings to recover the decretal amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Jun-2026
For Orders (Regular)
Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit Borkar
-
30-Apr-2025
Case filed
Case Summary: The Bombay High Court dismissed the Special Land Acquisition Officer's appeal for condonation of a 264-day delay in filing. The court found the State's explanation regarding administrative procedures and inter-departmental approvals insufficient, particularly noting a large unexplained gap from May 2019 to December 2024. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed, the respondent claimant's decree awarding compensation at Rs.1,380/- per square metre remains operative, and the claimant may proceed with execution proceedings to recover the decretal amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts