SHREE SANTPATI SHIVANARAYAN GURUDHAM TRUST vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THRO. MINISTRY OF CO-OPERATIVE — WP/7149/2026
Case under Mah. Co-op. Soc. Act Section na. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 09th June 2026.
CNR: HCBM010250302026
Filing Number
WP/14763/2026
Filing Date
12-05-2026
Registration No
WP/7149/2026
Registration Date
08-06-2026
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDEEP V. MARNE
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDEEP V. MARNE
Bench Type
Single
Category
ORDINARY CIVIL ( 30 )
Sub-Category
Cooperative Socities ( 103 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
09th June 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SHREE SANTPATI SHIVANARAYAN GURUDHAM TRUST
Adv. Karan Jain
Respondent(s)
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THRO. MINISTRY OF CO-OPERATIVE
THE LEARNED DISTRICT DEPUTY REGISTRAR CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES (
MUMBAI
SHIVANJALI CO-OPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY LTD THR. ITS HON.SCRETARY AND TREASURER
M/S A. G. DEVELOPERS
M/S RAO AND ASSOCIATES
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDEEP V. MARNE
FOR CIRCULATION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 09-06-2026 | FOR CIRCULATION |
Orders
Case Summary: WP/7149/2026 The Bombay High Court set aside the Competent Authority's orders dated 27 April 2026 and 1 June 2026 that reopened and restored a deemed conveyance application (Application No. 80 of 2025). The court held that once the Competent Authority closed the application on 2 December 2025 by directing the society to file a fresh application after litigation concluded, it became functus officio and lacked jurisdiction to reopen proceedings, as quasi-judicial authorities cannot review their own orders. The court permitted the society to file a new application as originally directed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: WP/7149/2026 The Bombay High Court set aside the Competent Authority's orders dated 27 April 2026 and 1 June 2026 that reopened and restored a deemed conveyance application (Application No. 80 of 2025). The court held that once the Competent Authority closed the application on 2 December 2025 by directing the society to file a fresh application after litigation concluded, it became functus officio and lacked jurisdiction to reopen proceedings, as quasi-judicial authorities cannot review their own orders. The court permitted the society to file a new application as originally directed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts