HRIDAYNATH DINANATH SALLE vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA — HCBM10247342026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226,227. Next hearing: 20th May 2026.

Next hearing 20-May-2026

CNR: HCBM010247342026

Filing Number

WP/10142/2026

Filing Date

08-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandesh Dadasaheb Patil

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandesh Dadasaheb Patil

Bench Type

Single

Category

CRIMINAL ( 9 )

Sub-Category

QUASHING OF FIR C.R., CHARGE SHEET OR PROSECUTION ( 26 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal

Last updated 29-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226,227
Indian Penal Code (I.p.c) Section 306,406,420,34

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.HRIDAYNATH DINANATH SALLE

    Adv. SMITH SHINDE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Case History

  1. 20-May-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 20-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandesh Dadasaheb PatilView PDF

    Case Summary: The Bombay High Court allowed Hridaynath Dinanath Salle's writ petition challenging the lower court's rejection of his request to travel abroad. Salle, accused in a criminal case involving sections 306, 406, 420 read with Section 34 IPC, sought permission to join his Merchant Navy employment with a letter of intent dated May 25, 2026. The Court permitted him to travel for eight months on strict conditions: providing detailed itinerary and contact information to the Investigating Officer, maintaining communication accessibility, and returning to Pune immediately upon expiry without extension requests. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 20-May-2026

    For Circulation

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandesh Dadasaheb Patil

  4. 08-May-2026

    Case filed

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: The Bombay High Court allowed Hridaynath Dinanath Salle's writ petition challenging the lower court's rejection of his request to travel abroad. Salle, accused in a criminal case involving sections 306, 406, 420 read with Section 34 IPC, sought permission to join his Merchant Navy employment with a letter of intent dated May 25, 2026. The Court permitted him to travel for eight months on strict conditions: providing detailed itinerary and contact information to the Investigating Officer, maintaining communication accessibility, and returning to Pune immediately upon expiry without extension requests. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case