Sate Bank of India Through its Authorized Signatory Debabrata Bhowmick UBR LEGAL ADVOCATES vs Union of India Through the Secretary Department of Revenue AND ORS Advocate - Sangeet Yadav — WP/10274/2025
Case under Central Goods and Service Tax Act Section NA. Next hearing: 09th July 2026.
CNR: HCBM010245582025
e-Filing Number
21-04-2025
Filing Number
WP/15635/2025
Filing Date
28-Apr-2025
Registration No
WP/10274/2025
Registration Date
24-Jul-2025
Judge
Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Suman Shyam
Coram
Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Suman Shyam
Bench Type
Division
Category
INDIRECT TAXES ( 17 )
Sub-Category
GST Goods and Services Tax ( 100 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Last updated 27-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Sate Bank of India Through its Authorized Signatory Debabrata Bhowmick UBR LEGAL ADVOCATES
Respondent(s)
-
1.Union of India Through the Secretary Department of Revenue AND ORS Advocate - Sangeet Yadav
-
2.State of Maharashtra
-
3.Additional Director, DGGI
-
4.Additional Commissioner of Central GST and Central Excise
-
5.Additional Commissioner of Central GST and Central Excise
Case History
-
09-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
09-Jul-2026
Due Admission - 1
Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Suman Shyam
-
22-Apr-2026
Hon'ble The Chief Justice,hon'ble Shri Justice Suman ShyamView PDF
-
17-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice G. S. Kulkarni,hon'ble Ms Justice Aarti A. SatheView PDF
-
17-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice G. S. Kulkarni,hon'ble Ms Justice Aarti A. SatheView PDF
Summary of WP/10274/2025 - State Bank of India v. Union of India Case Overview A batch of consolidated writ petitions challenging the issuance of single consolidated show-cause notices under Sections 73/74 of the CGST Act 2017 covering multiple financial years. The specific case (WP/10274/2025) involves State Bank of India (through authorized signatory Debabrata Bhowmick) challenging such notices issued by GST authorities. Key Issue Whether consolidated show-cause notices covering multiple financial years/tax periods violate Sections 73(10) and 74(10) of the CGST Act, which prescribe year-wise limitation periods. Current Order (17 April 2026) The two-judge bench (Justices G.S. Kulkarni and Aarti Sathe) dismissed the petitions, but referred the matter to a larger bench to decide substantial questions of law, given conflicting High Court decisions. Conflicting Legal Positions Against Consolidated Notices (Milroc & Others): - Bombay HC (Goa bench) in *Milroc Good Earth Developers v. UOI* (2026) - Madras HC, Kerala HC, Karnataka HC—held each financial year requires separate notice - Limitation periods are year-specific under Sections 73(10)/74(10) Supporting Consolidated Notices (Delhi & Allahabad): - Delhi HC in *Mathur Polymers v. UOI* and *Ambika Traders v. Commissioner* - Allahabad HC in *S.A. Aromatics Pvt. Ltd.*—held consolidation permissible for fraud/ITC cases - Supreme Court dismissed SLP in *Mathur Polymers* (7 Nov 2025), endorsing consolidated notices Court's Analysis The bench observed that: 1. Sections 73(1)/74(1) use "for any period"—not limited to single financial year 2. Sections 73(3)/74(3) explicitly permit issuing statements for other periods beyond the original notice 3. Limitation in Section 73(10)/74(10) applies to passing orders, not issuing notices 4. Each year's limitation remains separate even in consolidated proceedings 5. GST Policy Wing (16 Sept 2025) clarified consolidated notices don't extend limitation periods Questions Referred to Larger Bench 1. Does Section 73(10)/74(10) control Section 73(1)/74(1) operation? 2. Can consolidated notices be issued despite year-wise limitation? 3. Effect of Section 160 (protection for notices) on consolidated proceedings 4. Whether *Milroc* decision correctly applies the law 5. Legal position under Article 141 post-Supreme Court's *Mathur Polymers* order Interim Order All existing interim orders continue until the larger bench decides. Status: Case adjourned for larger bench constitution — no final decision on merits yet. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
13-Feb-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice G. S. Kulkarni,hon'ble Ms Justice Aarti A. SatheView PDF
-
13-Feb-2026
At 3.00 P.M.
Hon'ble Shri Justice G. S. Kulkarni , Hon'ble Ms Justice Aarti A. Sathe
-
12-Feb-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice G. S. Kulkarni,hon'ble Ms Justice Aarti A. SatheView PDF
-
12-Feb-2026
At 3.00 P.M.
Hon'ble Shri Justice G. S. Kulkarni , Hon'ble Ms Justice Aarti A. Sathe
-
11-Feb-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice G. S. Kulkarni,hon'ble Ms Justice Aarti A. SatheView PDF
-
16-Dec-2025
For Admission
Hon'ble Justice Advait M. Sethna , Hon'ble Shri Justice M.S. Sonak
-
09-Dec-2025
Hon'ble Justice Advait M. Sethna,hon'ble Shri Justice M.S. SonakView PDF
-
09-Dec-2025
For Admission
Hon'ble Justice Advait M. Sethna , Hon'ble Shri Justice M.S. Sonak
-
02-Dec-2025
Hon'ble Justice Advait M. Sethna,hon'ble Shri Justice M.S. SonakView PDF
-
02-Dec-2025
For Admission
Hon'ble Justice Advait M. Sethna , Hon'ble Shri Justice M.S. Sonak
-
11-Nov-2025
Hon'ble Justice Advait M. Sethna,hon'ble Shri Justice M.S. SonakView PDF
-
11-Nov-2025
For Admission
Hon'ble Justice Advait M. Sethna , Hon'ble Shri Justice M.S. Sonak
-
04-Nov-2025
Hon'ble Justice Advait M. Sethna,hon'ble Shri Justice M.S. SonakView PDF
-
04-Nov-2025
For Further Consideration
Hon'ble Justice Advait M. Sethna , Hon'ble Shri Justice M.S. Sonak
-
30-Sep-2025
Hon'ble Justice Advait M. Sethna,hon'ble Shri Justice M.S. SonakView PDF
-
30-Sep-2025
Final Disposal At The Stage Of Admission
Hon'ble Justice Advait M. Sethna , Hon'ble Shri Justice M.S. Sonak
-
09-Sep-2025
Hon'ble Justice Advait M. Sethna,hon'ble Shri Justice M.S. SonakView PDF
-
09-Sep-2025
Final Disposal At The Stage Of Admission
Hon'ble Shri Justice Jitendra Shantilal Jain , Hon'ble Shri Justice M.S. Sonak
-
04-Sep-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice Jitendra Shantilal Jain,hon'ble Shri Justice M.S. SonakView PDF
-
02-Sep-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice Jitendra Shantilal Jain,hon'ble Shri Justice M.S. SonakView PDF
-
02-Sep-2025
Final Disposal At The Stage Of Admission
Hon'ble Shri Justice Jitendra Shantilal Jain , Hon'ble Shri Justice M.S. Sonak
-
26-Aug-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice Jitendra Shantilal Jain,hon'ble Shri Justice M.S. SonakView PDF
-
19-Aug-2025
For Circulation
Hon'ble Shri Justice Jitendra Shantilal Jain , Hon'ble Shri Justice M.S. Sonak
-
06-Aug-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice Jitendra Shantilal Jain,hon'ble Shri Justice M.S. SonakView PDF
-
04-Aug-2025
For Circulation
Hon'ble Shri Justice Jitendra Shantilal Jain , Hon'ble Shri Justice M.S. Sonak
-
28-Jul-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice Jitendra Shantilal Jain,hon'ble Shri Justice M.S. SonakView PDF
-
28-Jul-2025
For Circulation
Hon'ble Shri Justice Jitendra Shantilal Jain , Hon'ble Shri Justice M.S. Sonak
-
01-Jul-2025
For Ad-Interim Relief
Hon'ble Shri Justice B.P. Colabawalla , Hon'ble Shri Justice Firdosh Phiroze Pooniwalla
-
06-May-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice B.P. Colabawalla,hon'ble Shri Justice Firdosh Phiroze PooniwallaView PDF
-
06-May-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
28-Apr-2025
Case filed
Registration No. WP/10274/2025
Summary of WP/10274/2025 - State Bank of India v. Union of India Case Overview A batch of consolidated writ petitions challenging the issuance of single consolidated show-cause notices under Sections 73/74 of the CGST Act 2017 covering multiple financial years. The specific case (WP/10274/2025) involves State Bank of India (through authorized signatory Debabrata Bhowmick) challenging such notices issued by GST authorities. Key Issue Whether consolidated show-cause notices covering multiple financial years/tax periods violate Sections 73(10) and 74(10) of the CGST Act, which prescribe year-wise limitation periods. Current Order (17 April 2026) The two-judge bench (Justices G.S. Kulkarni and Aarti Sathe) dismissed the petitions, but referred the matter to a larger bench to decide substantial questions of law, given conflicting High Court decisions. Conflicting Legal Positions Against Consolidated Notices (Milroc & Others): - Bombay HC (Goa bench) in *Milroc Good Earth Developers v. UOI* (2026) - Madras HC, Kerala HC, Karnataka HC—held each financial year requires separate notice - Limitation periods are year-specific under Sections 73(10)/74(10) Supporting Consolidated Notices (Delhi & Allahabad): - Delhi HC in *Mathur Polymers v. UOI* and *Ambika Traders v. Commissioner* - Allahabad HC in *S.A. Aromatics Pvt. Ltd.*—held consolidation permissible for fraud/ITC cases - Supreme Court dismissed SLP in *Mathur Polymers* (7 Nov 2025), endorsing consolidated notices Court's Analysis The bench observed that: 1. Sections 73(1)/74(1) use "for any period"—not limited to single financial year 2. Sections 73(3)/74(3) explicitly permit issuing statements for other periods beyond the original notice 3. Limitation in Section 73(10)/74(10) applies to passing orders, not issuing notices 4. Each year's limitation remains separate even in consolidated proceedings 5. GST Policy Wing (16 Sept 2025) clarified consolidated notices don't extend limitation periods Questions Referred to Larger Bench 1. Does Section 73(10)/74(10) control Section 73(1)/74(1) operation? 2. Can consolidated notices be issued despite year-wise limitation? 3. Effect of Section 160 (protection for notices) on consolidated proceedings 4. Whether *Milroc* decision correctly applies the law 5. Legal position under Article 141 post-Supreme Court's *Mathur Polymers* order Interim Order All existing interim orders continue until the larger bench decides. Status: Case adjourned for larger bench constitution — no final decision on merits yet. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts