DATTU DNYANDEO LAKADE AND ANR vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA — BA/2209/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Next hearing: 15th June 2026.
CNR: HCBM010245502026
Filing Number
BA/10093/2026
Filing Date
08-May-2026
Registration No
BA/2209/2026
Registration Date
08-May-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Ashwin D. Bhobe
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Ashwin D. Bhobe
Bench Type
Single
Category
BAIL ( 51 )
Sub-Category
Regular ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal
Last updated 14-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.DATTU DNYANDEO LAKADE AND ANR
Adv. Rahul Pandey
-
2.NARAYAN DNYANDEO LAKADE
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
Case History
-
15-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
15-Jun-2026
At 3.00 P.M.
Hon'ble Shri Justice Ashwin D. Bhobe
-
12-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Ashwin D. BhobeView PDF
Summary: This is a common order (not specific to case BA/2209/2026) issued by the Bombay High Court on 12 June 2026, adjourning multiple matters due to lack of hearing time. The court directed office objections be removed within one week, affidavits-in-reply filed within one week, and petitioners to supply spare copies for notice issuance within 7 days (failing which cases would be dismissed against unserved respondents). All listed matters were rescheduled across multiple dates from 15 June to 8 July 2026 for hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
12-Jun-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
08-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. BA/2209/2026
Summary: This is a common order (not specific to case BA/2209/2026) issued by the Bombay High Court on 12 June 2026, adjourning multiple matters due to lack of hearing time. The court directed office objections be removed within one week, affidavits-in-reply filed within one week, and petitioners to supply spare copies for notice issuance within 7 days (failing which cases would be dismissed against unserved respondents). All listed matters were rescheduled across multiple dates from 15 June to 8 July 2026 for hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts