TIPL JMMIPL JV Pvt Ltd UBR LEGAL ADVOCATES vs Union of India Through the Revenue Secretary ) Ministry of Finance Department of Revenue AND ORS — WP/17159/2025
Case under Central Goods and Service Tax Act Section 74. Next hearing: 09th July 2026.
CNR: HCBM010244562025
Next Hearing
09th July 2026
e-Filing Number
11-04-2025
Filing Number
WP/15570/2025
Filing Date
28-04-2025
Registration No
WP/17159/2025
Registration Date
16-12-2025
Judge
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SUMAN SHYAM
Coram
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SUMAN SHYAM
Bench Type
Division
Category
INDIRECT TAXES ( 17 )
Sub-Category
GST Goods and Services Tax ( 100 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
TIPL JMMIPL JV Pvt Ltd UBR LEGAL ADVOCATES
Respondent(s)
Union of India Through the Revenue Secretary ) Ministry of Finance Department of Revenue AND ORS
State of Maharashtra
Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs
Additional Commissioner CGST and C Ex, Raigad
Additional Director, DGGI, Zonal Unit, Mumbai
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SUMAN SHYAM
FOR AD-INTERIM RELIEF
DUE ADMISSION - 1
AT 3.00 P.M.
AT 3.00 P.M.
AT 3.00 P.M.
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 18-12-2025 | FOR AD-INTERIM RELIEF |
| 09-07-2026 | DUE ADMISSION - 1 |
| 13-02-2026 | AT 3.00 P.M. |
| 12-02-2026 | AT 3.00 P.M. |
| 11-02-2026 | AT 3.00 P.M. |
Orders
SUMMARY OF WP/17159/2025 Case: TIPL JMMIPL JV Pvt Ltd v. Union of India & Others Court: High Court of Judicature at Bombay (Division Bench: G.S. Kulkarni & Aarti Sathe, JJ.) Date: 17 April 2026 Key Outcome: Case REFERRED TO LARGER BENCH for determination of substantial questions of law regarding consolidated GST show-cause notices. --- CENTRAL ISSUE Whether the GST Department can issue a single consolidated show-cause notice covering multiple financial years under Sections 73/74 of the CGST Act, 2017. --- COURT'S DECISION The Division Bench did not decide the petitions on merits but instead identified a conflict of judicial opinion among High Courts requiring resolution by a Larger Bench. Five Questions Referred to Larger Bench: 1. Whether Section 73(10)/74(10) limitation provisions control issuance of consolidated notices 2. Whether sub-section (10) per se prohibits consolidated notices for multiple years 3. Effect of Section 160 on such proceedings 4. Whether *Milroc Good Earth Developers* decision (which invalidated consolidated notices) lays down correct law 5. Legal position after Supreme Court's order in *Mathur Polymers* --- CONFLICTING JUDICIAL POSITIONS Against Consolidated Notices: - *Milroc Good Earth Developers v. Union of India* (Bombay HC) - Courts in Kerala, Karnataka, Madras For Consolidated Notices: - Delhi High Court (*Mathur Polymers*, *Ambika Traders*) - Allahabad High Court (*S.A. Aromatics*) - Supreme Court dismissed SLP in *Mathur Polymers* (7 Nov 2025) without finding "good ground" to interfere --- INTERIM ORDER All interim orders previously passed shall continue until the Larger Bench decides the issues. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
SUMMARY OF WP/17159/2025 Case: TIPL JMMIPL JV Pvt Ltd v. Union of India & Others Court: High Court of Judicature at Bombay (Division Bench: G.S. Kulkarni & Aarti Sathe, JJ.) Date: 17 April 2026 Key Outcome: Case REFERRED TO LARGER BENCH for determination of substantial questions of law regarding consolidated GST show-cause notices. --- CENTRAL ISSUE Whether the GST Department can issue a single consolidated show-cause notice covering multiple financial years under Sections 73/74 of the CGST Act, 2017. --- COURT'S DECISION The Division Bench did not decide the petitions on merits but instead identified a conflict of judicial opinion among High Courts requiring resolution by a Larger Bench. Five Questions Referred to Larger Bench: 1. Whether Section 73(10)/74(10) limitation provisions control issuance of consolidated notices 2. Whether sub-section (10) per se prohibits consolidated notices for multiple years 3. Effect of Section 160 on such proceedings 4. Whether *Milroc Good Earth Developers* decision (which invalidated consolidated notices) lays down correct law 5. Legal position after Supreme Court's order in *Mathur Polymers* --- CONFLICTING JUDICIAL POSITIONS Against Consolidated Notices: - *Milroc Good Earth Developers v. Union of India* (Bombay HC) - Courts in Kerala, Karnataka, Madras For Consolidated Notices: - Delhi High Court (*Mathur Polymers*, *Ambika Traders*) - Allahabad High Court (*S.A. Aromatics*) - Supreme Court dismissed SLP in *Mathur Polymers* (7 Nov 2025) without finding "good ground" to interfere --- INTERIM ORDER All interim orders previously passed shall continue until the Larger Bench decides the issues. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts