TIPL JMMIPL JV Pvt Ltd UBR LEGAL ADVOCATES vs Union of India Through the Revenue Secretary ) Ministry of Finance Department of Revenue AND ORS — WP/17159/2025

Case under Central Goods and Service Tax Act Section 74. Next hearing: 09th July 2026.

CNR: HCBM010244562025

Next Hearing

09th July 2026

e-Filing Number

11-04-2025

Filing Number

WP/15570/2025

Filing Date

28-04-2025

Registration No

WP/17159/2025

Registration Date

16-12-2025

Judge

HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SUMAN SHYAM

Coram

HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SUMAN SHYAM

Bench Type

Division

Category

INDIRECT TAXES ( 17 )

Sub-Category

GST Goods and Services Tax ( 100 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Acts & Sections

Central Goods and Service Tax Act Section 74

Petitioner(s)

TIPL JMMIPL JV Pvt Ltd UBR LEGAL ADVOCATES

Respondent(s)

Union of India Through the Revenue Secretary ) Ministry of Finance Department of Revenue AND ORS

State of Maharashtra

Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs

Additional Commissioner CGST and C Ex, Raigad

Additional Director, DGGI, Zonal Unit, Mumbai

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SUMAN SHYAM

18-12-2025

FOR AD-INTERIM RELIEF

09-07-2026

DUE ADMISSION - 1

13-02-2026

AT 3.00 P.M.

12-02-2026

AT 3.00 P.M.

11-02-2026

AT 3.00 P.M.

Orders

17-04-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE G. S. KULKARNI,HON'BLE MS JUSTICE AARTI A. SATHE

SUMMARY OF WP/17159/2025 Case: TIPL JMMIPL JV Pvt Ltd v. Union of India & Others Court: High Court of Judicature at Bombay (Division Bench: G.S. Kulkarni & Aarti Sathe, JJ.) Date: 17 April 2026 Key Outcome: Case REFERRED TO LARGER BENCH for determination of substantial questions of law regarding consolidated GST show-cause notices. --- CENTRAL ISSUE Whether the GST Department can issue a single consolidated show-cause notice covering multiple financial years under Sections 73/74 of the CGST Act, 2017. --- COURT'S DECISION The Division Bench did not decide the petitions on merits but instead identified a conflict of judicial opinion among High Courts requiring resolution by a Larger Bench. Five Questions Referred to Larger Bench: 1. Whether Section 73(10)/74(10) limitation provisions control issuance of consolidated notices 2. Whether sub-section (10) per se prohibits consolidated notices for multiple years 3. Effect of Section 160 on such proceedings 4. Whether *Milroc Good Earth Developers* decision (which invalidated consolidated notices) lays down correct law 5. Legal position after Supreme Court's order in *Mathur Polymers* --- CONFLICTING JUDICIAL POSITIONS Against Consolidated Notices: - *Milroc Good Earth Developers v. Union of India* (Bombay HC) - Courts in Kerala, Karnataka, Madras For Consolidated Notices: - Delhi High Court (*Mathur Polymers*, *Ambika Traders*) - Allahabad High Court (*S.A. Aromatics*) - Supreme Court dismissed SLP in *Mathur Polymers* (7 Nov 2025) without finding "good ground" to interfere --- INTERIM ORDER All interim orders previously passed shall continue until the Larger Bench decides the issues. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

SUMMARY OF WP/17159/2025 Case: TIPL JMMIPL JV Pvt Ltd v. Union of India & Others Court: High Court of Judicature at Bombay (Division Bench: G.S. Kulkarni & Aarti Sathe, JJ.) Date: 17 April 2026 Key Outcome: Case REFERRED TO LARGER BENCH for determination of substantial questions of law regarding consolidated GST show-cause notices. --- CENTRAL ISSUE Whether the GST Department can issue a single consolidated show-cause notice covering multiple financial years under Sections 73/74 of the CGST Act, 2017. --- COURT'S DECISION The Division Bench did not decide the petitions on merits but instead identified a conflict of judicial opinion among High Courts requiring resolution by a Larger Bench. Five Questions Referred to Larger Bench: 1. Whether Section 73(10)/74(10) limitation provisions control issuance of consolidated notices 2. Whether sub-section (10) per se prohibits consolidated notices for multiple years 3. Effect of Section 160 on such proceedings 4. Whether *Milroc Good Earth Developers* decision (which invalidated consolidated notices) lays down correct law 5. Legal position after Supreme Court's order in *Mathur Polymers* --- CONFLICTING JUDICIAL POSITIONS Against Consolidated Notices: - *Milroc Good Earth Developers v. Union of India* (Bombay HC) - Courts in Kerala, Karnataka, Madras For Consolidated Notices: - Delhi High Court (*Mathur Polymers*, *Ambika Traders*) - Allahabad High Court (*S.A. Aromatics*) - Supreme Court dismissed SLP in *Mathur Polymers* (7 Nov 2025) without finding "good ground" to interfere --- INTERIM ORDER All interim orders previously passed shall continue until the Larger Bench decides the issues. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case