JANG BAHADUR SARDAR SHARMA THRU CONSTITUTED ATTORNEY vs THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER SRA AND ORS — WP/6877/2026
Case under Slum Areas (Improvement, Clearance and Redevelopment) Protection of Tenants in Slum Areas from Eviction Rules (Maharashtra) Section NA. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 12th June 2026.
CNR: HCBM010243842026
Filing Number
WP/14334/2026
Filing Date
08-05-2026
Registration No
WP/6877/2026
Registration Date
26-05-2026
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M. S. KARNIK , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE S. M. MODAK
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M. S. KARNIK , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE S. M. MODAK
Bench Type
Division
Category
SLUM AREAS ( 49 )
Sub-Category
SLUM AREAS ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
12th June 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
JANG BAHADUR SARDAR SHARMA THRU CONSTITUTED ATTORNEY
Adv. Madhura Mulay
Respondent(s)
THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER SRA AND ORS
THE DY. COLLECTOR AND COMPETENT AUTHORITY SLUM REHABILITATION AUTHORITY
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M. S. KARNIK , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE S. M. MODAK
FRESH ADMISSION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-06-2026 | FRESH ADMISSION |
Orders
The Bombay High Court dismissed the writ petition filed by Jang Bahadur Sardar Sharma challenging his exclusion from Annexure-II in a slum rehabilitation matter, finding that he had an efficacious alternative remedy available under Section 35 of the Maharashtra Slum Areas Act, 1971 by appealing to the Apex Grievance Redressal Committee. The court disposed of the petition but directed the AGRC to expedite hearing and decide the appeal on merits within twelve weeks if filed within two weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Bombay High Court dismissed the writ petition filed by Jang Bahadur Sardar Sharma challenging his exclusion from Annexure-II in a slum rehabilitation matter, finding that he had an efficacious alternative remedy available under Section 35 of the Maharashtra Slum Areas Act, 1971 by appealing to the Apex Grievance Redressal Committee. The court disposed of the petition but directed the AGRC to expedite hearing and decide the appeal on merits within twelve weeks if filed within two weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts