DIPEN D DOSHI AND ANR vs BANK OF INDIA AND ANR — HCBM10243562026
Case under Securitisation & Reconstruction of Finiancial Assets Act. Next hearing: 16th June 2026.
CNR: HCBM010243562026
Next Hearing
16th June 2026
Filing Number
WP/14315/2026
Filing Date
08-05-2026
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MANISH PITALE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE FARHAN PARVEZ DUBASH
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MANISH PITALE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE FARHAN PARVEZ DUBASH
Bench Type
Division
Category
MERCANTILE LAWS COMMERCIAL TRANSACTIONS , BANKS ( 28 )
Sub-Category
MATTERS RELATING TO SECURITISATION AND RECONSTRUCTION OF FINANCIAL ASSETS ( 10 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
DIPEN D DOSHI AND ANR
Adv. Jainish Jain
AMISHA DIPEN DOSHI
Respondent(s)
BANK OF INDIA AND ANR
FUDKOR INDIA PVT. LTD.
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MANISH PITALE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE FARHAN PARVEZ DUBASH
FOR CIRCULATION
HIGH ON BOARD -
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 08-05-2026 | FOR CIRCULATION |
| 16-06-2026 | HIGH ON BOARD - |
Orders
Case Summary: Doshi v. Bank of India Outcome: Interim protection granted; asset seizure deferred. The Bombay High Court deferred Bank of India's planned seizure of secured assets from May 11 to May 20, 2026. The petitioners—a company director and guarantor—had complied with a Rs. 40 lakh pre-deposit order from the Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal (DRAT), but their appeal was dismissed for default on March 16, 2026, when their advocate failed to appear due to lack of notice of the new Chairperson's appointment. The court granted temporary protection to allow petitioners time to file restoration applications before DRAT, with no opinion expressed on merits. Case adjourned to June 16, 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Doshi v. Bank of India Outcome: Interim protection granted; asset seizure deferred. The Bombay High Court deferred Bank of India's planned seizure of secured assets from May 11 to May 20, 2026. The petitioners—a company director and guarantor—had complied with a Rs. 40 lakh pre-deposit order from the Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal (DRAT), but their appeal was dismissed for default on March 16, 2026, when their advocate failed to appear due to lack of notice of the new Chairperson's appointment. The court granted temporary protection to allow petitioners time to file restoration applications before DRAT, with no opinion expressed on merits. Case adjourned to June 16, 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts