SAILESH GULAB ADVANI AND ORS vs TARMINDER SINGH KHURANA AND ORS Advocate - Duraiya Saifuddin Retiwala, VP FOR RES. NO. 1, 4, 5,VP FOR RES.NO. 2,3,Duraiya Saifuddin Retiwala,Duraiya Saifuddin Retiwala,Dharini Nagda — AO/593/2016

Case under C.p.c.- (Interlocutory Order). Next hearing: 11th June 2026.

CNR: HCBM010242702016

Next Hearing

11th June 2026

Filing Number

AO/16142/2016

Filing Date

14-06-2016

Registration No

AO/593/2016

Registration Date

28-06-2016

Judge

HON'BLE JUSTICE SHRI ARIF S. DOCTOR

Coram

HON'BLE JUSTICE SHRI ARIF S. DOCTOR

Bench Type

Single

Category

ORDINARY CIVIL ( 30 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Acts & Sections

C.p.c.- (Interlocutory Order)
Transfer of Property Act
Indian Contract Act 1872

Petitioner(s)

SAILESH GULAB ADVANI AND ORS

Adv. Charanjeet

GAUTAM GULAB ADVANI

MRS. NIRMALA GULAB ADVANI

Respondent(s)

TARMINDER SINGH KHURANA AND ORS Advocate - Duraiya Saifuddin Retiwala, VP FOR RES. NO. 1, 4, 5,VP FOR RES.NO. 2,3,Duraiya Saifuddin Retiwala,Duraiya Saifuddin Retiwala,Dharini Nagda

MAHESH ATMARAM BASWANI

BHARAT LEKHRAJ HARWANI

JAGDISH GOPALDUTT CHOUNAL

CHANDAN GOPALDUTT CHOUNAL

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE JUSTICE SHRI ARIF S. DOCTOR

11-07-2016

APPEALS FOR ADMISSION - FRESH [CIVIL SIDE MATTERS]

11-06-2026

FOR ORDERS (DUE MATTERS)

23-04-2026

FOR ORDERS (DUE MATTERS)

02-04-2026

FOR DISMISSAL

05-02-2026

FOR ADMISSION

Orders

23-04-2026
HON'BLE JUSTICE SHRI ARIF S. DOCTOR

Case AO/593/2016 Summary: The High Court of Bombay adjourned the civil appeal on 23rd April 2026 to 11th June 2026. Appellants' counsel undertook to inform the parties of the next hearing date. The court warned that if no one appears on the next occasion, the appeal shall be dismissed for want of prosecution. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case AO/593/2016 Summary: The High Court of Bombay adjourned the civil appeal on 23rd April 2026 to 11th June 2026. Appellants' counsel undertook to inform the parties of the next hearing date. The court warned that if no one appears on the next occasion, the appeal shall be dismissed for want of prosecution. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case