MR.SANJAY BODAIRAM GUPTA @ SANJAY PHOOLCHAND GUPTA vs MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF GREATER MUMBAI AND OTHERS — AO/572/2026

Case under Bombay Municipal Corporation Act. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 08th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM010241782026

Filing Number

AO/14204/2026

Filing Date

07-May-2026

Registration No

AO/572/2026

Registration Date

09-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. Jadhav

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. Jadhav

Bench Type

Single

Category

ELECTION ( 12 )

Sub-Category

MUNICIPAL CORPORATION ( 7 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

08-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 12-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bombay Municipal Corporation Act

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MR.SANJAY BODAIRAM GUPTA @ SANJAY PHOOLCHAND GUPTA

    Adv. Omprakash Pandey

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF GREATER MUMBAI AND OTHERS

  2. 2.MUMBAI MUNICIPAL COMMISSIONER MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF GREATER MUMBAI

  3. 3.ASSISTANT MUNICIPAL COMMISSIONER K EAST WARD

  4. 4.ASSISTANT ENGINEER ZONE II K SOUTH WARD

  5. 5.ASSISTANT ENGINEER MAINTENANCE2 K SOUTH WARD.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. JadhavView PDF

    The Bombay High Court disposed of the appeal and remanded the Notice of Motion to the Trial Court for final decision after complete pleadings. The court directed the defendants (Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai and Dairy Department) to file their affidavit-in-reply within six weeks, with the plaintiff permitted to file a rejoinder within two weeks thereafter. The court imposed a stay on any coercive action against the plaintiff's Aarey Stall until the Trial Court's final decision, with an additional four-week stay if the decision is adverse to the plaintiff, allowing time for further legal recourse. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. AO/572/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court disposed of the appeal and remanded the Notice of Motion to the Trial Court for final decision after complete pleadings. The court directed the defendants (Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai and Dairy Department) to file their affidavit-in-reply within six weeks, with the plaintiff permitted to file a rejoinder within two weeks thereafter. The court imposed a stay on any coercive action against the plaintiff's Aarey Stall until the Trial Court's final decision, with an additional four-week stay if the decision is adverse to the plaintiff, allowing time for further legal recourse. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case