MR.SANJAY BODAIRAM GUPTA @ SANJAY PHOOLCHAND GUPTA vs MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF GREATER MUMBAI AND OTHERS — AO/572/2026
Case under Bombay Municipal Corporation Act. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 08th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM010241782026
Filing Number
AO/14204/2026
Filing Date
07-05-2026
Registration No
AO/572/2026
Registration Date
09-06-2026
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MILIND N. JADHAV
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MILIND N. JADHAV
Bench Type
Single
Category
ELECTION ( 12 )
Sub-Category
MUNICIPAL CORPORATION ( 7 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
08th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
MR.SANJAY BODAIRAM GUPTA @ SANJAY PHOOLCHAND GUPTA
Adv. Omprakash Pandey
Respondent(s)
MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF GREATER MUMBAI AND OTHERS
MUMBAI MUNICIPAL COMMISSIONER MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF GREATER MUMBAI
ASSISTANT MUNICIPAL COMMISSIONER K EAST WARD
ASSISTANT ENGINEER ZONE II K SOUTH WARD
ASSISTANT ENGINEER MAINTENANCE2 K SOUTH WARD.
Orders
The Bombay High Court disposed of the appeal and remanded the Notice of Motion to the Trial Court for final decision after complete pleadings. The court directed the defendants (Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai and Dairy Department) to file their affidavit-in-reply within six weeks, with the plaintiff permitted to file a rejoinder within two weeks thereafter. The court imposed a stay on any coercive action against the plaintiff's Aarey Stall until the Trial Court's final decision, with an additional four-week stay if the decision is adverse to the plaintiff, allowing time for further legal recourse. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Bombay High Court disposed of the appeal and remanded the Notice of Motion to the Trial Court for final decision after complete pleadings. The court directed the defendants (Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai and Dairy Department) to file their affidavit-in-reply within six weeks, with the plaintiff permitted to file a rejoinder within two weeks thereafter. The court imposed a stay on any coercive action against the plaintiff's Aarey Stall until the Trial Court's final decision, with an additional four-week stay if the decision is adverse to the plaintiff, allowing time for further legal recourse. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts