ANSARI MARYAM ZAINULABDIN SHRI. N.R.BUBNA vs SHAFIK AHMED MOH. SHAFI — WP/6561/2009

Case under Constitution of India. Disposed: --Disposed Off on 01st April 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 30-Jul-2009

CNR: HCBM010241152009

Filing Number

WP/16249/2009

Filing Date

13-Jul-2009

Registration No

WP/6561/2009

Registration Date

29-Jul-2009

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit Borkar

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit Borkar

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

01-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

--Disposed Off

Last updated 02-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ANSARI MARYAM ZAINULABDIN SHRI. N.R.BUBNA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SHAFIK AHMED MOH. SHAFI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 01-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit BorkarView PDF

    The Bombay High Court allowed the writ petitions challenging the State Information Commissioner's order under the RTI Act, 2005, finding that the Second Appellate Authority lacked power to direct a departmental inquiry against the school official and that the ₹25,000 cost imposed was unjustified given the voluminous nature of information sought. The Court set aside the impugned order, refunded the deposited amount with interest, and held that no departmental inquiry could be initiated against the retired employee. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Dec-2009

    Hon'ble Shri Justice D.B. BhosaleView PDF

  4. 14-Dec-2009

    Due Admission

    Hon'ble Shri Justice D.B. Bhosale

  5. 14-Dec-2009

    Due Admission

    Hon'ble Shri Justice D.B. Bhosale

  6. 27-Nov-2009

    For Due Admission

    Hon'ble Shri Justice D.B. Bhosale

  7. 28-Aug-2009

    Unserved Notice

    Hon'ble Shri Justice D.B. Bhosale

  8. 30-Jul-2009

    Hon'ble Shri Justice D.B. BhosaleView PDF

  9. 30-Jul-2009

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 13-Jul-2009

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/6561/2009

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court allowed the writ petitions challenging the State Information Commissioner's order under the RTI Act, 2005, finding that the Second Appellate Authority lacked power to direct a departmental inquiry against the school official and that the ₹25,000 cost imposed was unjustified given the voluminous nature of information sought. The Court set aside the impugned order, refunded the deposited amount with interest, and held that no departmental inquiry could be initiated against the retired employee. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case