Vidya Gopal Sapte vs The State of Maharashtra hrough the Secretary, School Education and Sports Department AND ORS — WP/6961/2026
Case under Mah. Pvt. School (C of S) Regulation Act Section 226. Next hearing: 25th June 2026.
CNR: HCBM010240982026
Next Hearing
25th June 2026
e-Filing Number
07-05-2026
Filing Number
WP/14153/2026
Filing Date
07-05-2026
Registration No
WP/6961/2026
Registration Date
29-05-2026
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHYAM C. CHANDAK , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE FARHAN PARVEZ DUBASH
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHYAM C. CHANDAK , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE FARHAN PARVEZ DUBASH
Bench Type
Division
Category
OTHER SERVICE MATTERS ( 66 )
Sub-Category
TEACHING STAFF ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Vidya Gopal Sapte
Adv. KOKILA KALRA
Respondent(s)
The State of Maharashtra hrough the Secretary, School Education and Sports Department AND ORS
The Commissioner of Education
The Director of Education
The Deputy Director of Education Mumbai Region Mumbai
The Education Officer
Saraswati Shikshan Prasarak Mandal
Raigad Madhyamik Vidya Mandir
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHYAM C. CHANDAK , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE FARHAN PARVEZ DUBASH
FOR CIRCULATION
FOR CIRCULATION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 01-06-2026 | FOR CIRCULATION |
| 25-06-2026 | FOR CIRCULATION |
Orders
In Writ Petition No. 6961 of 2026, the Bombay High Court heard arguments from petitioner Vidya Gopal Sapte against the State of Maharashtra and others. The court issued notice to respondents returnable on 25th June 2026, with the State's counsel waiving notice. The petitioner was directed to provide adequate copies to the registry for service. The case was adjourned for substantive hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
In Writ Petition No. 6961 of 2026, the Bombay High Court heard arguments from petitioner Vidya Gopal Sapte against the State of Maharashtra and others. The court issued notice to respondents returnable on 25th June 2026, with the State's counsel waiving notice. The petitioner was directed to provide adequate copies to the registry for service. The case was adjourned for substantive hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts