JANAKI SALIAN AND OTHERS vs GOPAL KRISHNAPPA SHRIYAN AND OTHERS — HCBM10239622026

Case under C.p.c.- (Interlocutory Order) Section 104. Next hearing: 12th June 2026.

Next hearing 12-Jun-2026

CNR: HCBM010239622026

Filing Number

AO/14056/2026

Filing Date

07-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Justice Sharmila U. Deshmukh

Coram

Hon'ble Justice Sharmila U. Deshmukh

Bench Type

Single

Category

CIVIL APPEALS ( 45 )

Sub-Category

Single Bench Matters ( 2 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Last updated 12-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

C.p.c.- (Interlocutory Order) Section 104

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.JANAKI SALIAN AND OTHERS

    Adv. Kevin Gala

  2. 2.RAJESHWARI VELONDE DAUGHTER OF DECEASED VAIJANTHI PANDU KUNDAR

  3. 3.TEJASWINI KOTIAN DAUGHTER OF DECEASED VAIJANTHI PANDU KUNDAR

  4. 4.VISHWAS SHRIYAN GUPTA DAUGHTER OF DECEASED ANUSAYA DINESH GUPTA

  5. 5.JAYALAKSHMI KRISHNAPPA SHRIYAN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.GOPAL KRISHNAPPA SHRIYAN AND OTHERS

  2. 2.REKHA NANDU BANGERA

  3. 3.SWATI GUPTA DAUGHTER OF DECEASED ANUSAYA DINESH GUPTA

  4. 4.SHIBA SHETTY DAUGHTER OF DECEASED ANUSAYA DINESH GUPTA

  5. 5.DEEPA GUPTA DAUGHTER OF DECEASED ANUSAYA DINESH GUPTA

  6. 6.THE SIDDHARTH NAGAR C OPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY LTD

  7. 7.MAHARASHTRA HOUSING AND AREA DEVELOPEMENT AUTHORITY MHADA

Case History

  1. 12-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 12-Jun-2026

    For Admission

    Hon'ble Justice Sharmila U. Deshmukh

  3. 08-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. JadhavView PDF

    Case Summary The High Court of Bombay adjourned the appeal to June 12, 2026. The court issued notice to respondents and directed them to file an Affidavit-in-Reply within three weeks. The appellants (claiming settled possession of redeveloped MHADA property since 2007) are permitted to serve the appeal notice on respondents. The court noted it requires fuller hearing of all interested parties before deciding on the restraint on handing over the redeveloped tenement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 07-May-2026

    Case filed

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary The High Court of Bombay adjourned the appeal to June 12, 2026. The court issued notice to respondents and directed them to file an Affidavit-in-Reply within three weeks. The appellants (claiming settled possession of redeveloped MHADA property since 2007) are permitted to serve the appeal notice on respondents. The court noted it requires fuller hearing of all interested parties before deciding on the restraint on handing over the redeveloped tenement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case