HRISHIKESH PRAKASH MAHADIK vs NAAYANA HRISHIKESH MAHADIK — IA/3578/2026

Case under Family Court Act Section 19. Next hearing: 25th June 2026.

Next hearing 25-Jun-2026

CNR: HCBM010239412026

Filing Number

IA/14037/2026

Filing Date

07-May-2026

Registration No

IA/3578/2026

Registration Date

07-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Smt. Justice Bharati Dangre , Hon'ble Justice Smt Manjusha Ajay Deshpande

Coram

Hon'ble Smt. Justice Bharati Dangre , Hon'ble Justice Smt Manjusha Ajay Deshpande

Bench Type

Division

Category

FAMILY LAW ( 16 )

Sub-Category

DIVORCE/DISSOLUTION ( 4 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Last updated 12-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Family Court Act Section 19

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.HRISHIKESH PRAKASH MAHADIK

    Adv. Vijay Kurle

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.NAAYANA HRISHIKESH MAHADIK

Case History

  1. 25-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 25-Jun-2026

    For Circulation

    Hon'ble Smt. Justice Bharati Dangre , Hon'ble Justice Smt Manjusha Ajay Deshpande

  3. 08-May-2026

    Hon'ble Smt. Justice Bharati Dangre,hon'ble Justice Smt Manjusha Ajay DeshpandeView PDF

    Case Summary: IA/3578/2026 Outcome: The High Court of Bombay kept the Family Court's interim maintenance order (Rs. 10,000/month) in abeyance pending further investigation. The Court directed both parties to file affidavits addressing the appellant's claim that the respondent remarried on 15/3/2019 during their marriage subsistence. The Court warned of perjury liability for false statements and scheduled the case for further consideration on 25/6/2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 08-May-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 07-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. IA/3578/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: IA/3578/2026 Outcome: The High Court of Bombay kept the Family Court's interim maintenance order (Rs. 10,000/month) in abeyance pending further investigation. The Court directed both parties to file affidavits addressing the appellant's claim that the respondent remarried on 15/3/2019 during their marriage subsistence. The Court warned of perjury liability for false statements and scheduled the case for further consideration on 25/6/2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case