TUKARAM MARUTI PARIHAR SHRI J.B. KOCHETA vs PAWAN RAMDAYAL AGARWAL AND ANR — APEAL/708/2009

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 01st April 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 30-Jun-2009

CNR: HCBM010238072009

Filing Number

APEAL/761/2009

Filing Date

09-Jul-2009

Registration No

APEAL/708/2009

Registration Date

09-Jul-2009

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice R. N. Laddha

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice R. N. Laddha

Bench Type

Single

Category

CRIMINAL ( 9 )

Sub-Category

AGAINST ORDER OF ACQUITTAL ( 2 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal

Decision Date

01-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 04-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.TUKARAM MARUTI PARIHAR SHRI J.B. KOCHETA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.PAWAN RAMDAYAL AGARWAL AND ANR

  2. 2.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 01-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice R. N. LaddhaView PDF

    The Bombay High Court transferred Criminal Appeal No. 708 of 2009 from the High Court to the concerned Sessions Court, holding that a complainant under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act has the statutory right to appeal against an acquittal order under Section 372 of the CrPC. The court directed the Sessions Court to register and decide the appeal on its merits expeditiously, considering the matter's long pendency. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Jul-2009

    Case filed

    Registration No. APEAL/708/2009

  4. 30-Jun-2009

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 30-Jun-2009

    Notification

    Hon'ble Shri Justice A.R. Joshi

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court transferred Criminal Appeal No. 708 of 2009 from the High Court to the concerned Sessions Court, holding that a complainant under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act has the statutory right to appeal against an acquittal order under Section 372 of the CrPC. The court directed the Sessions Court to register and decide the appeal on its merits expeditiously, considering the matter's long pendency. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case