AMIT GORDHANBHAI PARMAR AND ORS vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR — HCBM10237522026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: 08th May 2026.

Next hearing 08-May-2026

CNR: HCBM010237522026

Filing Number

WP/9831/2026

Filing Date

06-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Ashwin D. Bhobe

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Ashwin D. Bhobe

Bench Type

Single

Category

CRIMINAL ( 9 )

Sub-Category

Quashing FIR, C.R., Charge Sheet - Crime against Women and Children ( 106 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal

Last updated 12-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 528
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 85,115(2),352,351(2),3(5)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.AMIT GORDHANBHAI PARMAR AND ORS

    Adv. UMA KSHIRSAGAR WAGLE

  2. 2.GORDHANBHAI MOHAN PARMAR

  3. 3.KANCHAN GORDHANBHAI PARMAR

  4. 4.DAKSHA GORDHANBHAI PARMAR

  5. 5.SHILA GORDHANBHAI PARMAR

  6. 6.HEENA GORDHANBHAI PARMAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

  2. 2.SWATI AMIT PARMAR

Case History

  1. 08-May-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 09-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Ashwin D. BhobeView PDF

  3. 08-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Ashwin D. BhobeView PDF

  4. 08-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Ashwin D. BhobeView PDF

    Case Summary The Bombay High Court allowed the writ petition and quashed FIR No. 0050 of 2025 and the accompanying charge-sheet filed at Bolinj Police Station. The petition arose from a matrimonial dispute between petitioners and respondent Swati Amit Parmar, which was amicably settled in a prior writ petition; respondent No. 2 filed an affidavit giving no objection to quashing the criminal proceedings, and the State also did not oppose. The Court imposed costs of Rs. 15,000 on petitioner No. 1 and Rs. 25,000 on respondent No. 2, payable within four weeks as a condition precedent to the relief. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  5. 08-May-2026

    At 3.00 P.M.

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Ashwin D. Bhobe

  6. 07-May-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 06-May-2026

    Case filed

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary The Bombay High Court allowed the writ petition and quashed FIR No. 0050 of 2025 and the accompanying charge-sheet filed at Bolinj Police Station. The petition arose from a matrimonial dispute between petitioners and respondent Swati Amit Parmar, which was amicably settled in a prior writ petition; respondent No. 2 filed an affidavit giving no objection to quashing the criminal proceedings, and the State also did not oppose. The Court imposed costs of Rs. 15,000 on petitioner No. 1 and Rs. 25,000 on respondent No. 2, payable within four weeks as a condition precedent to the relief. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case