ROHIT @ PAKHARYA SURESH DHOTRE vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR — HCBM10236732026

Case under The Schedule Caste and Schedule Tribes(prevention of Atrocities) Act Section 14A, 3(2)(va), 3(1)(s), 3(1)(r), 3(2)(5). Next hearing: 22nd June 2026.

CNR: HCBM010236732026

Next Hearing

22nd June 2026

Filing Number

APEAL/9816/2026

Filing Date

06-05-2026

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE R. M. JOSHI

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE R. M. JOSHI

Bench Type

Single

Category

CRIMINAL APPEAL ( 58 )

Sub-Category

Against Order under SC-ST Act (Section 14-A-Other) ( 16 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal

Acts & Sections

The Schedule Caste and Schedule Tribes(prevention of Atrocities) Act Section 14A, 3(2)(va), 3(1)(s), 3(1)(r), 3(2)(5)
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 352,351(2),351(3),333,191(3),191(2),190,189(2),118(2),118(1),115(2)
Police Act (Maharashtra) Section 135
Arms Act Section 4,25

Petitioner(s)

ROHIT @ PAKHARYA SURESH DHOTRE

Adv. Rupesh Atul Zade

Respondent(s)

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Sapna Atish Aware

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE R. M. JOSHI

08-05-2026

FOR CIRCULATION

22-06-2026

FOR CIRCULATION

Orders

08-05-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE R. M. JOSHI

Case Summary: In Criminal Appeal (ST) No. 9816 of 2026, the Bombay High Court granted ad-interim bail relief to appellant Rohit @ Pakharya Suresh Dhotre. The court found that the charge-sheet had been filed, the alleged weapon (bamboo stick) was already seized, co-accused were enlarged on bail, and the appellant had no criminal history, making custodial interrogation unnecessary. The case was adjourned to 22nd June 2026 for further hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: In Criminal Appeal (ST) No. 9816 of 2026, the Bombay High Court granted ad-interim bail relief to appellant Rohit @ Pakharya Suresh Dhotre. The court found that the charge-sheet had been filed, the alleged weapon (bamboo stick) was already seized, co-accused were enlarged on bail, and the appellant had no criminal history, making custodial interrogation unnecessary. The case was adjourned to 22nd June 2026 for further hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case