RENU LUFAR SARDAR vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA — APEAL/418/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 415(2). Next hearing: 22nd June 2026.

Next hearing 22-Jun-2026

CNR: HCBM010236552026

Filing Number

APEAL/9808/2026

Filing Date

06-May-2026

Registration No

APEAL/418/2026

Registration Date

06-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice R. M. Joshi

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice R. M. Joshi

Bench Type

Single

Category

CRIMINAL APPEAL ( 58 )

Sub-Category

Against Conviction - By Convicted Person - on Bail ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal

Last updated 12-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 415(2)
Passports Rules Section 3(a),6(a)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RENU LUFAR SARDAR

    Adv. FARHANA SHAH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Case History

  1. 22-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 22-Jun-2026

    For Circulation

    Hon'ble Shri Justice R. M. Joshi

  3. 08-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice R. M. JoshiView PDF

    Case Summary: APEAL/418/2026 The High Court of Bombay heard Renu Lufar Sardar's criminal appeal challenging an impugned order on 8th May, 2026. The appellant sought a stay of the order; however, the court declined to grant an immediate stay, noting that the appellant has already completed her substantive sentence and therefore urgency was not established. The court adjourned the matter to 22nd June, 2026, to allow the prosecution opportunity to file its response and be heard. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 08-May-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 06-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. APEAL/418/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: APEAL/418/2026 The High Court of Bombay heard Renu Lufar Sardar's criminal appeal challenging an impugned order on 8th May, 2026. The appellant sought a stay of the order; however, the court declined to grant an immediate stay, noting that the appellant has already completed her substantive sentence and therefore urgency was not established. The court adjourned the matter to 22nd June, 2026, to allow the prosecution opportunity to file its response and be heard. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case