GANESAN VENKATRAMAN AND ORS vs THE DEPUTY REGISTRAR CO OPERATIVE SOCIETIES M WARD AND ORS — WP/7208/2026

Case under Mah. Co-op. Soc. Act Section NA. Next hearing: 17th June 2026.

Next hearing 17-Jun-2026

CNR: HCBM010236302026

Filing Number

WP/13834/2026

Filing Date

06-May-2026

Registration No

WP/7208/2026

Registration Date

09-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandeep V. Marne

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandeep V. Marne

Bench Type

Single

Category

ORDINARY CIVIL ( 30 )

Sub-Category

Cooperative Socities ( 103 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Last updated 12-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Mah. Co-op. Soc. Act Section NA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GANESAN VENKATRAMAN AND ORS

    Adv. Ganesh and Co

  2. 2.MANU PATEL

  3. 3.SUBRAMANIAN SESHADRI RAMANAN

  4. 4.SANDEEP KOTHARI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE DEPUTY REGISTRAR CO OPERATIVE SOCIETIES M WARD AND ORS

  2. 2.CHEMBUR GULMARG CO-OPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY LTD

  3. 3.AUTHORIZED OFFICER DATTATRAY G. DHOBALE

  4. 4.STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH GOVERNMENT PLEADER

Case History

  1. 17-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 17-Jun-2026

    For Circulation

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandeep V. Marne

  3. 11-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandeep V. MarneView PDF

    In WP 7208/2026, the Bombay High Court heard petitioners' grievance that an inquiry report under Section 83 of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 was not provided to the society, violating statutory mandate. The court adjourned the case to 17 June 2026 for further consideration, allowing the state's counsel time to take instructions on the matter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 11-Jun-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 06-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/7208/2026

casestatus.in Summary

In WP 7208/2026, the Bombay High Court heard petitioners' grievance that an inquiry report under Section 83 of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 was not provided to the society, violating statutory mandate. The court adjourned the case to 17 June 2026 for further consideration, allowing the state's counsel time to take instructions on the matter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case