THE COMMISSIONER, MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF GREATER MUMBAI AND ORS R. A. MALANDKAR vs MR. SURYAKANT BHAGWAN TAWADE — WP/5860/2012
Case under M.r.t.u. & P.u.l.p. Act. Disposed: Contested--Partly Allowed on 30th April 2026.
CNR: HCBM010235722012
Next Hearing
03rd August 2012
Filing Number
WP/15796/2012
Filing Date
16-06-2012
Registration No
WP/5860/2012
Registration Date
30-06-2012
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE AMIT BORKAR
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE AMIT BORKAR
Bench Type
Single
Category
LABOUR MATTERS DB ( 19 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
30th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Partly Allowed
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
THE COMMISSIONER, MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF GREATER MUMBAI AND ORS R. A. MALANDKAR
Respondent(s)
MR. SURYAKANT BHAGWAN TAWADE
Adv. SOLE RESPONDENT,Shane Clifford Cardoz 1123
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE AMIT BORKAR
PETITIONS FOR ADMISSION - FRESH CIVIL SIDE MATTERS
AT 3.00 P.M.
AT 3.00 P.M.
AT 3.00 P.M.
AT 3.00 P.M.
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 03-08-2012 | PETITIONS FOR ADMISSION - FRESH CIVIL SIDE MATTERS |
| 17-04-2026 | AT 3.00 P.M. |
| 06-03-2026 | AT 3.00 P.M. |
| 06-02-2026 | AT 3.00 P.M. |
| 09-01-2026 | AT 3.00 P.M. |
Orders
Summary The Bombay High Court partially allowed MCGM's writ petition, modifying the Industrial Court's 2012 order. While upholding the finding of unfair labour practice for making the respondent discharge Death Registration Karkoon duties without corresponding benefits, the court quashed the direction for substantive promotion/regularization, holding that no formal promotion order existed. However, the respondent remains entitled to monetary benefits and wage differences for the period he actually performed higher duties, to be computed within 12 weeks and paid within 8 weeks thereafter at 6% interest if delayed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Bombay High Court partially allowed MCGM's writ petition, modifying the Industrial Court's 2012 order. While upholding the finding of unfair labour practice for making the respondent discharge Death Registration Karkoon duties without corresponding benefits, the court quashed the direction for substantive promotion/regularization, holding that no formal promotion order existed. However, the respondent remains entitled to monetary benefits and wage differences for the period he actually performed higher duties, to be computed within 12 weeks and paid within 8 weeks thereafter at 6% interest if delayed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts