ADIS INFRASTRUCTURE PVT LTD THR ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR SHIRISH YASHWANT JOSHI vs M/S. ZEN INFRASTRUCTURE THR ITS PROPRIETOR RAVINDRA LAXMAN KATADE — HCBM10234842026

Case under C.p.c.- (Interlocutory Order) Section 24. Next hearing: : -.

CNR: HCBM010234842026

Next Hearing

: -

e-Filing Number

27-04-2026

Filing Number

MCA/13735/2026

Filing Date

05-05-2026

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAJESH S. PATIL

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAJESH S. PATIL

Bench Type

Single

Category

TRANSFER OF CASES WITH IN THE STATE ( 59 )

Sub-Category

SUBORDINATE COURTS ( 2 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Acts & Sections

C.p.c.- (Interlocutory Order) Section 24

Petitioner(s)

ADIS INFRASTRUCTURE PVT LTD THR ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR SHIRISH YASHWANT JOSHI

Adv. PRAFUL SIDHARTH PAWAR

Respondent(s)

M/S. ZEN INFRASTRUCTURE THR ITS PROPRIETOR RAVINDRA LAXMAN KATADE

I.T.N.L. BAEL DURGAPUR THR ITS PROJECT MANAGER VINOD TRIPATHI

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAJESH S. PATIL

08-05-2026

FRESH MATTERS AUTO LISTED

Orders

08-05-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAJESH S. PATIL

Case Summary ADIS INFRASTRUCTURE PVT LTD v. ZEN INFRASTRUCTURE (MCAST 13735/2026) The Bombay High Court, on 8 May 2026, heard a Miscellaneous Civil Application filed under Section 15(5) of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015. The court directed the Registry to verify the application and place the matter before the appropriate Court for proper jurisdiction determination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary ADIS INFRASTRUCTURE PVT LTD v. ZEN INFRASTRUCTURE (MCAST 13735/2026) The Bombay High Court, on 8 May 2026, heard a Miscellaneous Civil Application filed under Section 15(5) of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015. The court directed the Registry to verify the application and place the matter before the appropriate Court for proper jurisdiction determination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case