SHYAMAL JITENDRA DOKE vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA — IA/1619/2026

Case under Criminal Procedure Code (Cr.pc) Section 439. Disposed: --Disposed Off on 29th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM010234732026

Filing Number

IA/9745/2026

Filing Date

05-May-2026

Registration No

IA/1619/2026

Registration Date

11-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Shyam C. Chandak

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Shyam C. Chandak

Bench Type

Single

Category

BAIL ( 51 )

Sub-Category

Others ( 5 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal

Decision Date

29-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--Disposed Off

Last updated 30-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Criminal Procedure Code (Cr.pc) Section 439

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SHYAMAL JITENDRA DOKE

    Adv. LAW ORIGIN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

  2. 2.PARAS SHRIPALKUMAR SHAH

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 29-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Shyam C. ChandakView PDF

    The Bombay High Court granted the applicant Paras Shripalkumar Shah leave to withdraw his bail application with liberty to file a regular bail application before the Sessions Court, noting that he had already surrendered on May 27, 2026, after the charge-sheet was filed. The court also disposed of the intervenor Shyamal Jitendra Doke's intervention application as it no longer survived. Additionally, the court ordered the Commissioner of Police to refund the excess amount of Rs. 1,50,048/- deposited by the applicant, retaining only the required Rs. 89,115/-. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 05-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. IA/1619/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court granted the applicant Paras Shripalkumar Shah leave to withdraw his bail application with liberty to file a regular bail application before the Sessions Court, noting that he had already surrendered on May 27, 2026, after the charge-sheet was filed. The court also disposed of the intervenor Shyamal Jitendra Doke's intervention application as it no longer survived. Additionally, the court ordered the Commissioner of Police to refund the excess amount of Rs. 1,50,048/- deposited by the applicant, retaining only the required Rs. 89,115/-. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case