SHRI. DEEPAK VINAYAK KAMAT vs SMT. RAJASHRI SADASHIV REGE NEE RAJASHRI VINAYAK KAMAT AND OTHERS — IA/3928/2026
Case under C.p.c.- (Interlocutory Order) Section 104. Next hearing: : -.
CNR: HCBM010234282026
Next Hearing
: -
Filing Number
IA/13698/2026
Filing Date
05-05-2026
Registration No
IA/3928/2026
Registration Date
08-06-2026
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MILIND N. JADHAV
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MILIND N. JADHAV
Bench Type
Single
Category
CIVIL APPEALS ( 45 )
Sub-Category
Single Bench Matters ( 2 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SHRI. DEEPAK VINAYAK KAMAT
Adv. Rupesh R Lanjekar
Respondent(s)
SMT. RAJASHRI SADASHIV REGE NEE RAJASHRI VINAYAK KAMAT AND OTHERS
ASHOK VINAYAK KAMAT
BHARATIYA KALA MANDAL CO OPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY THR THE SECRETARY
M/S KEYSTONE REALTORS LTD RUSTOMJEE GROUP
Orders
Case Summary: IA/3928/2026 - Deepak Vinayak Kamat v. Rajashri Sadashiv Rege & Others The High Court of Bombay partially allowed Deepak Kamat's appeal against the trial court's interim order dated 02.05.2026. The court deleted the rejection of interim relief from the impugned order and remitted the matter to the trial court to comprehensively consider all issues, including Deepak's substantive right to reside in the suit flat based on his mother's will which grants him lifetime residence rights (with the flat ultimately bequeathed to his sister, Defendant No.1). The trial court was directed to pass a reasoned order after parties complete their pleadings within specified timelines (defendants' affidavit-in-reply within 4 weeks, rejoinder within 2 weeks thereafter). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: IA/3928/2026 - Deepak Vinayak Kamat v. Rajashri Sadashiv Rege & Others The High Court of Bombay partially allowed Deepak Kamat's appeal against the trial court's interim order dated 02.05.2026. The court deleted the rejection of interim relief from the impugned order and remitted the matter to the trial court to comprehensively consider all issues, including Deepak's substantive right to reside in the suit flat based on his mother's will which grants him lifetime residence rights (with the flat ultimately bequeathed to his sister, Defendant No.1). The trial court was directed to pass a reasoned order after parties complete their pleadings within specified timelines (defendants' affidavit-in-reply within 4 weeks, rejoinder within 2 weeks thereafter). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts