SHRI. DEEPAK VINAYAK KAMAT vs SMT. RAJASHRI SADASHIV REGE NEE RAJASHRI VINAYAK KAMAT AND OTHERS — IA/3928/2026

Case under C.p.c.- (Interlocutory Order) Section 104. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: HCBM010234282026

Filing Number

IA/13698/2026

Filing Date

05-May-2026

Registration No

IA/3928/2026

Registration Date

08-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. Jadhav

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. Jadhav

Bench Type

Single

Category

CIVIL APPEALS ( 45 )

Sub-Category

Single Bench Matters ( 2 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Last updated 12-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

C.p.c.- (Interlocutory Order) Section 104

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SHRI. DEEPAK VINAYAK KAMAT

    Adv. Rupesh R Lanjekar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SMT. RAJASHRI SADASHIV REGE NEE RAJASHRI VINAYAK KAMAT AND OTHERS

  2. 2.ASHOK VINAYAK KAMAT

  3. 3.BHARATIYA KALA MANDAL CO OPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY THR THE SECRETARY

  4. 4.M/S KEYSTONE REALTORS LTD RUSTOMJEE GROUP

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 07-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. JadhavView PDF

    Case Summary: IA/3928/2026 - Deepak Vinayak Kamat v. Rajashri Sadashiv Rege & Others The High Court of Bombay partially allowed Deepak Kamat's appeal against the trial court's interim order dated 02.05.2026. The court deleted the rejection of interim relief from the impugned order and remitted the matter to the trial court to comprehensively consider all issues, including Deepak's substantive right to reside in the suit flat based on his mother's will which grants him lifetime residence rights (with the flat ultimately bequeathed to his sister, Defendant No.1). The trial court was directed to pass a reasoned order after parties complete their pleadings within specified timelines (defendants' affidavit-in-reply within 4 weeks, rejoinder within 2 weeks thereafter). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 05-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. IA/3928/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: IA/3928/2026 - Deepak Vinayak Kamat v. Rajashri Sadashiv Rege & Others The High Court of Bombay partially allowed Deepak Kamat's appeal against the trial court's interim order dated 02.05.2026. The court deleted the rejection of interim relief from the impugned order and remitted the matter to the trial court to comprehensively consider all issues, including Deepak's substantive right to reside in the suit flat based on his mother's will which grants him lifetime residence rights (with the flat ultimately bequeathed to his sister, Defendant No.1). The trial court was directed to pass a reasoned order after parties complete their pleadings within specified timelines (defendants' affidavit-in-reply within 4 weeks, rejoinder within 2 weeks thereafter). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case