SHRI. DEEPAK VINAYAK KAMAT vs SMT. RAJASHRI SADASHIV REGE NEE RAJASHRI VINAYAK KAMAT AND OTHERS — AO/557/2026

Case under C.p.c.- (Interlocutory Order) Section 104. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 07th May 2026.

CNR: HCBM010234272026

CASE DISPOSED

Filing Number

AO/13697/2026

Filing Date

05-05-2026

Registration No

AO/557/2026

Registration Date

08-06-2026

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MILIND N. JADHAV

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MILIND N. JADHAV

Bench Type

Single

Category

CIVIL APPEALS ( 45 )

Sub-Category

Single Bench Matters ( 2 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

07th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Acts & Sections

C.p.c.- (Interlocutory Order) Section 104

Petitioner(s)

SHRI. DEEPAK VINAYAK KAMAT

Adv. Rupesh R Lanjekar

Respondent(s)

SMT. RAJASHRI SADASHIV REGE NEE RAJASHRI VINAYAK KAMAT AND OTHERS

ASHOK VINAYAK KAMAT

BHARATIYA KALA MANDAL CO OPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY THR THE SECRETARY

M/S KEYSTONE REALTORS LTD RUSTOMJEE GROUP

Orders

07-05-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MILIND N. JADHAV

Case Summary: AO/557/2026 The Bombay High Court partially allowed Deepak Vinayak Kamat's appeal against a trial court's interim order in a property dispute involving a residential flat. The court found that Kamat demonstrated a prima facie right to reside in the flat during his lifetime based on his mother's will, despite the flat being ultimately bequeathed to his sister (Defendant No.1). The High Court deleted the trial court's rejection of interim relief and remitted the matter back to the trial court to comprehensively consider all issues raised by both parties—including questions of inheritance rights, party relationships, and the flat's occupation—and pass a reasoned final order after completion of pleadings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: AO/557/2026 The Bombay High Court partially allowed Deepak Vinayak Kamat's appeal against a trial court's interim order in a property dispute involving a residential flat. The court found that Kamat demonstrated a prima facie right to reside in the flat during his lifetime based on his mother's will, despite the flat being ultimately bequeathed to his sister (Defendant No.1). The High Court deleted the trial court's rejection of interim relief and remitted the matter back to the trial court to comprehensively consider all issues raised by both parties—including questions of inheritance rights, party relationships, and the flat's occupation—and pass a reasoned final order after completion of pleadings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case