SREEJA SURESH AND OTHERS vs NATRAJ CATERERS SOLE PROP. AMRIK SINGH AND OTHERS Advocate - deepa pohuja — AO/426/2026

Case under C.p.c.- (Interlocutory Order) Section 104. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 08th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM010234162026

Filing Number

AO/13690/2026

Filing Date

05-May-2026

Registration No

AO/426/2026

Registration Date

06-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. Jadhav

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. Jadhav

Bench Type

Single

Category

CIVIL APPEALS ( 45 )

Sub-Category

Single Bench Matters ( 2 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

08-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 12-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

C.p.c.- (Interlocutory Order) Section 104

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SREEJA SURESH AND OTHERS

    Adv. Mansi Shah

  2. 2.PRADEEP GOPALAN

  3. 3.PRAMOD GOPALAN

  4. 4.RAMILA GOPALAN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.NATRAJ CATERERS SOLE PROP. AMRIK SINGH AND OTHERS Advocate - deepa pohuja

  2. 2.DESIGNATED OFFICER ASST. ENGINEER BIDG AND FACT.

  3. 3.ASST. ENGINEER, HYDRAULIC DEPT.

  4. 4.MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF GREATER MUMBAI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. JadhavView PDF

    The Bombay High Court set aside the Trial Court's order discontinuing a long-standing ad-interim order from 2018 and restored it. The court directed the Trial Court to finally decide the pending Motion No. 4625 of 2018 by June 20, 2024, with parties completing pleadings by June 8, 2026, rejecting the lower court's reasoning that discontinued relief due to the plaintiff's advocate's absence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-May-2026

    For Direction

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. Jadhav

  4. 07-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. JadhavView PDF

  5. 07-May-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 05-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. AO/426/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court set aside the Trial Court's order discontinuing a long-standing ad-interim order from 2018 and restored it. The court directed the Trial Court to finally decide the pending Motion No. 4625 of 2018 by June 20, 2024, with parties completing pleadings by June 8, 2026, rejecting the lower court's reasoning that discontinued relief due to the plaintiff's advocate's absence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case