SREEJA SURESH AND OTHERS vs NATRAJ CATERERS SOLE PROP. AMRIK SINGH AND OTHERS Advocate - deepa pohuja — AO/426/2026

Case under C.p.c.- (Interlocutory Order) Section 104. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 08th May 2026.

CNR: HCBM010234162026

CASE DISPOSED

Filing Number

AO/13690/2026

Filing Date

05-05-2026

Registration No

AO/426/2026

Registration Date

06-05-2026

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MILIND N. JADHAV

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MILIND N. JADHAV

Bench Type

Single

Category

CIVIL APPEALS ( 45 )

Sub-Category

Single Bench Matters ( 2 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

08th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Acts & Sections

C.p.c.- (Interlocutory Order) Section 104

Petitioner(s)

SREEJA SURESH AND OTHERS

Adv. Mansi Shah

PRADEEP GOPALAN

PRAMOD GOPALAN

RAMILA GOPALAN

Respondent(s)

NATRAJ CATERERS SOLE PROP. AMRIK SINGH AND OTHERS Advocate - deepa pohuja

DESIGNATED OFFICER ASST. ENGINEER BIDG AND FACT.

ASST. ENGINEER, HYDRAULIC DEPT.

MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF GREATER MUMBAI

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MILIND N. JADHAV

07-05-2026

FOR DIRECTION

08-05-2026

FOR DIRECTION

Orders

08-05-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MILIND N. JADHAV

The Bombay High Court set aside the Trial Court's order discontinuing a long-standing ad-interim order from 2018 and restored it. The court directed the Trial Court to finally decide the pending Motion No. 4625 of 2018 by June 20, 2024, with parties completing pleadings by June 8, 2026, rejecting the lower court's reasoning that discontinued relief due to the plaintiff's advocate's absence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court set aside the Trial Court's order discontinuing a long-standing ad-interim order from 2018 and restored it. The court directed the Trial Court to finally decide the pending Motion No. 4625 of 2018 by June 20, 2024, with parties completing pleadings by June 8, 2026, rejecting the lower court's reasoning that discontinued relief due to the plaintiff's advocate's absence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case